Yes, I am not being fair. I have X and the fwvm manager running
and I much prefer the 9 windows I have to work from over the drab non X
linux. And I have pictures of my children scanned into .gif files and
displayed as wall paper.
Just got kernel 2.0.35 running a few minutes ago
> The argument that Linux MUST have windows like win-95 to be
> popular is to say that win-95 is good.
>
No, it means that several win95 (just GUI and standard widget set)
features are necessary for the layman to adopt Linux as a desktop OS.
One can argue that Linux doesn'