Hello all,
I'm hoping that this layout here will make it easy for anyone to
figure out what booboo i've done?
I'm attempting to use Lars' method, since i really don't know how to
setup with only 1 (gateways have confused me)
i just can't get anything working...
client: 192.168.2.10 -> 192.168.2.1
Hi all,
I'm having some major stability problems with my three-node CS/GFS cluster.
Every two or three days, one of the nodes fences another, and I have to
hard-reboot the entire cluster to recover. I have had this happen twice
today. I don't know what's triggering the fencing, since all the
Randy Brown wrote:
I forgotI'm using Centos 5 with latest patches and kernel.
Randy Brown wrote:
I am using an APC Masterswitch Plus as my fencing device. I am
seeing this in my logs now when fencing occurs:
Dec 31 11:36:26 nfs1-cluster fenced[3848]: agent "fence_apc" reports:
Traceba
Kamal Jain wrote:
Hi Wendy,
IOZONE v3.283 was used to generate the results I posted.
An example invocation line [for the IOPS result]:
./iozone -O -l 1 -u 8 -T -b
/root/iozone_IOPS_1_TO_8_THREAD_1_DISK_ISCSI_DIRECT.xls -F
/mnt/iscsi_direct1/iozone/iozone1.tmp ...
It's for 1 to 8 threads,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:08:57AM -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:37 +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > After running a cluster node in a production cluster since July, I got
> > the folllowing error:
> >
> > #48: Unable to obtain cluster lock: Invalid argument
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 11:31 +0100, Holger Woehle wrote:
> Hi,
> at the moment i am evaluating RHCM and Heartbeat V2 to refine our
> Heartbeat V1 Cluster.
> My question as in the subject:
> Is it possible to use GFS without the RHCM ?
Not sure. You don't need rgmanager, but you need
fencing/membe
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 06:29 -0800, Roger Peña wrote:
> --- Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> both servers thinks that the other one are death, so I
> guess you have a problem with comunication between the
> nodes after the bonding is set
>
> What I wonder now is why fencing do not work :-(
> it
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 08:16 +0400, Harun wrote:
> Issue: When network cable is disconnected from the Primary, primary restart
> unclean and the failover to secondary do not happens. The shared drives
> don't get mounted automatically for secondary neither gets it mounted on
> primary, after the pri
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:37 +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After running a cluster node in a production cluster since July, I got
> the folllowing error:
>
> #48: Unable to obtain cluster lock: Invalid argument
What version of rgmanager was it?
-- Lon
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
L
Hi Wendy,
IOZONE v3.283 was used to generate the results I posted.
An example invocation line [for the IOPS result]:
./iozone -O -l 1 -u 8 -T -b
/root/iozone_IOPS_1_TO_8_THREAD_1_DISK_ISCSI_DIRECT.xls -F
/mnt/iscsi_direct1/iozone/iozone1.tmp ...
It's for 1 to 8 threads, and I provided 8 fil
Hi.
After running a cluster node in a production cluster since July, I got
the folllowing error:
#48: Unable to obtain cluster lock: Invalid argument
Which resulted in a reboot:
--clip--
Dec 27 02:50:31 pcn1 clurgmgrd[6217]: #48: Unable to obtain
cluster lock: Invalid argument
Dec 27 02:50:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 13:31 -0800, Scooter Morris wrote:
> Greetings,
> We've got a two-node cluster running RHEL 5.1 that we've been
> experimenting with and have discovered a problem with gfs2. As part of
> our build environment, we have some find scripts that walk a directory tree:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
