[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any GFS tuning I can do which might help speed up access to
these mailboxes?
You probably need GFS2 in this case. To fix mail server issues in GFS1
would be too intrusive with current state of development cycle.
I noticed you mention that GFS2 might be best f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any GFS tuning I can do which might help speed up access to
these mailboxes?
You probably need GFS2 in this case. To fix mail server issues in GFS1
would be too intrusive with current state of development cycle.
Wendy,
I noticed you mention that
With direct routing, all the nodes must be visible to the outside world
using the same route as the director(s). If you're trying to route
*through* your director, you need to use NAT (or tun, which I've never
used). Direct routing means that you are not using the director as a
router, just a loa
Ah, thanks.
No, for the time being I'm running the bits released for RHEL4U4. Good
to know that freezing will be available at sometime in the future.
BTW, what will it be called ? Freezing ?
-Mike
--- Lon Hohberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:45 -0800, Michael Harriso
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:48 -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:45 -0800, Michael Harrison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to freeze a service, so that rgmanager effectively
> > ignores it? In other words, when doing maintenance on a production
> > cluster, it's sometimes
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:45 -0800, Michael Harrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to freeze a service, so that rgmanager effectively
> ignores it? In other words, when doing maintenance on a production
> cluster, it's sometimes necessary to stop the cluster services on that
> node. When rgmanage
James Fidell wrote:
I have a 3-node cluster built on CentOS 5.1, fully updated, providing
Maildir mail spool filesystems to dovecot-based IMAP servers. As it
stands GFS is in its default configuration -- no tuning has been done
so far.
Mostly, it's working fine. Unfortunately we do have a few
What I'd like to do is stop the cluster components, leaving the
services running. So for example, stop rgmanager, fenced, cman, ccsd
for upgrades or whatever, and not have rgmanager fail over an IP
address that it would otherwise control.
Does it make sense?
Cheers,
-Mike
--- Robinson Maureira
Hi there, you can always stop and disable a service using:
clusvcadm -d
And start and re-enabling it later with:
clusvcadm -e
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Michael Harrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to freeze a service, so that rgmanager effectively
> ignores it? In other words, when
>> Is there any GFS tuning I can do which might help speed up access to
>> these mailboxes?
>>
> You probably need GFS2 in this case. To fix mail server issues in GFS1
> would be too intrusive with current state of development cycle.
Wendy,
I noticed you mention that GFS2 might be best for this.
James Fidell wrote:
I have a 3-node cluster built on CentOS 5.1, fully updated, providing
Maildir mail spool filesystems to dovecot-based IMAP servers. As it
stands GFS is in its default configuration -- no tuning has been done
so far.
Mostly, it's working fine. Unfortunately we do have a few
Robert Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 15:49 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I'm using a 1-node GFS1 "cluster" with DLM locking and sporadically
>> (say once a week) get the following in the kernel logs (Linux 2.6.23):
>>
>> GFS: fsid=noc:cricket.0: warning: assertion "
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 15:49 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I'm using a 1-node GFS1 "cluster" with DLM locking and sporadically
> (say once a week) get the following in the kernel logs (Linux 2.6.23):
>
> GFS: fsid=noc:cricket.0: warning: assertion "(tmp_gh->gh_flags &
> GL_LOCAL_EXCL) || !(gh->gh
I have a 3-node cluster built on CentOS 5.1, fully updated, providing
Maildir mail spool filesystems to dovecot-based IMAP servers. As it
stands GFS is in its default configuration -- no tuning has been done
so far.
Mostly, it's working fine. Unfortunately we do have a few people with
tens of th
14 matches
Mail list logo
