What kind of cluster is this - an academic project or production quality
solution?
If its former - go for manual fencing. You wont need fence device but
failover wont be automatic
If its later - yes you'll need fence device
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
Hi Digimer,
Could you please give me reference/case studies of problem about why manual
fencing was dropped and how automated fencing is fixing those?
Thanks,
Parvez
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 10/02/2012 04:00 AM, Parvez Shaikh wrote:
What kind of
This talks about how manual fencing isn't actual fencing;
https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/Fence
There was a page where it was said that manual fencing was in no way
supported, but I can't find it at the moment.
The reason it is not safe is that an admin is likely to issue it in a
Greetings,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
The reason it is not safe is that an admin is likely to issue it in a panic
while trying to get a hung cluster back online. If this happens without
+1
+1
+1
first ensuring the peer node(s) is fenced, you can walk
A curious observation, there is a sudden surge of sending emails on private
addresses rather than sending over a mailing list.
Please send your doubts / questions on mailing list
linux-cluster@redhat.com instead of addressing personally.
Regarding configuration for manual fencing - I don't have
