On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:49:42PM +0530, Parvez Shaikh wrote:
Is this situation possible? If so, can two nodes possibly fence (in short
shutdown or reboot) each other? Is there anyway out of this situation?
http://people.redhat.com/lhh/ClusterPitfalls.pdf
--
Lon Hohberger - Red Hat, Inc.
Hi Lon
http://people.redhat.com/lhh/ClusterPitfalls.pdf
In that PDF you write:
Can be used to create highly scalable NFS servers.
I see how you can use GFS1/2 to make a redundant setup, but I am not sure
what you mean by highly scalable here, or how to do it? Is there a best
practise
Greetings,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Parvez Shaikh
parvez.h.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
redundant network link - i trust you were referring to ethernet bonding.
This is a fairly common problem called split brain. The two nodes will
go into a shootout, fencing each other. There are a few
redundant network link - i trust you were referring to ethernet bonding.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ian Hayes cthulhucall...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Parvez Shaikh parvez.h.sha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question pertaining to two node cluster, I
Hi all,
I have a question pertaining to two node cluster, I have RHEL 5.5 and
cluster along with it which at least should have two nodes.
In a situation where both nodes of the cluster are up, and have reliable
connection to fencing device (e.g. power switch OR any other power fencing
device)
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Parvez Shaikh
parvez.h.sha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I have a question pertaining to two node cluster, I have RHEL 5.5 and
cluster along with it which at least should have two nodes.
In a situation where both nodes of the cluster are up, and have reliable
