> > As a workaround to avoid an unwanted bast callback after a completion, I
> > wonder if you could make a no-op call with NULL astaddr/astarg to prevent
> > any further callback using those?
>
> I assume that what you call a no-op is a lock conversion towards the same
> mode as before,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, David Teigland wrote:
> As a workaround to avoid an unwanted bast callback after a completion, I
> wonder if you could make a no-op call with NULL astaddr/astarg to prevent
> any further callback using those?
I assume that what you call a no-op is a lock conversion towards
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:42:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Saffroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuing with my experiments with the DLM user API, I am trying to use
> blocking AST callbacks, and find that the rules for the lifetime and
> ownership of the dlm_lksb struct are a bit surprising. This led me to
