Hi,
I've set the maximum size of core files to unlimited:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lib]# ulimit -c
unlimited
But it does not appears anything on /var/lib/openais... Any idea?
Thanks!
Jordi
Steven Bakker wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:11:35 +0200 Jordi Prats wrote:
On /var/lib/openais/ I found
I have a cluster with two nodes ,it has started.
On the conga platform ,when I choose add a failover domain ,
it returned as followed:
Network station Error£º
this network station occured an error when handle your request.
the error is :
error type:
AttributeError
error value:
Hi again,
After stress testing a gfs filesystem for 24 hours fsck.gfs complains about
Found unlinked inode.
This scared me so I reran the test again but got the same result.
My test consists of two nodes running bonnie++, postgresql and pgbench against
a single file system. Every five
minutes
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:29:51PM -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote:
Certainly for testing, you can just replace rgmanager + cman + deps.
5.1 rgmanager requires 5.1 cman due to changes in the ccs daemon.
Note that these (runtime) dependencies are not enforced by the rpms,
not are there proper
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:33:41AM +0200, Borgstr?m Jonas wrote:
Hi again,
After stress testing a gfs filesystem for 24 hours fsck.gfs complains
about Found unlinked inode. This scared me so I reran the test again
but got the same result.
My test consists of two nodes running bonnie++,
--- Alain Moulle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Marc and Jos for your pieces of advice, but
it does not seems to work:
I tried your first suggestion with qdisk votes=2 and
expected_votes=3:
quorumd interval=1 tko=10 votes=2
log_level=9
log_facility=local4
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:33 +0200, Borgström Jonas wrote:
Hi again,
After stress testing a gfs filesystem for 24 hours fsck.gfs complains about
Found unlinked inode.
This scared me so I reran the test again but got the same result.
My test consists of two nodes running bonnie++,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Peterson
Sent: den 26 september 2007 16:01
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Found unlinked inode
Hi Jonas,
Well, I can think of one possible explanation. I can't be sure because
I don't know your test
Hi again,
I was just able to reproduce the filesystem corruption again. This time four
lost zero-sized inodes were found :(
And unfortunately mounting+umounting the filesystem didn't make the lost inodes
go away.
I still have a copy of the corrupted filesystem if there is any more things you
David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:40:59PM +0200, Borgstr??m Jonas wrote:
Hi again,
I was just able to reproduce the filesystem corruption again. This time
four lost zero-sized inodes were found :( And unfortunately
mounting+umounting the filesystem didn't make the lost
Hello List,
has this fix
http://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-April/msg00064.html
Rgmanager thinks qdisk is a node (with node ID 0), so it tries to send
VF information to node 0 - which doesn't exist, causing rgmanger to not
work when qdisk is running :(
already been included in
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:50:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-April/msg00064.html
Rgmanager thinks qdisk is a node (with node ID 0), so it tries to send
VF information to node 0 - which doesn't exist, causing rgmanger to not
work when
I have two nodes on the same subnet, can ping each other, are both
alive, both are members of a two-node cluster. When I start cman on
both nodes at the same time it says X not a cluster member after 60 sec
post_join_delay. The output of clustat shows that the other node is
Offline and the first
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Cheng
Sent: den 26 september 2007 19:37
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Found unlinked inode
Wendy Cheng wrote:
Just read this mail - not sure the running kernel version where this
problem occurs .
Hi,
If this is a lab or dev can you turn off iptables if
its running. Then later fine tune your iptables rules.
Sometimes its just a firewall issue.
-R
--- Ozarchuk, John D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two nodes on the same subnet, can ping each
other, are both
alive, both are members
Ozarchuk, John D wrote:
I have two nodes on the same subnet, can ping each other, are both
alive, both are members of a two-node cluster. When I start cman on
both nodes at the same time it says “X not a cluster member after 60 sec
post_join_delay”. The output of clustat shows that the other
This is a cman_tool nodes from each node...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cman_tool nodes
Node Sts Inc Joined Name
1 X 24bplmft12
2 M 4 2007-09-26 13:33:04 bplmft11
Last login: Wed Sep 26 14:35:26 2007 from bplmft11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
I am a newbie and am trying to add a node to an existing cluster.
I am running into issues when trying to add a 4th node to a cluster of three
RHEL-5 machines.
Since the /etc/cluster/cluster.conf file does not have the information
(clusternode name, fence info etc) of the fourth node, I decided
Borgström Jonas wrote:
Hi Wendy, thanks for your answer.
To answer your earlier question, the kernel version used is 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5. I
just noticed that a never kernel version is available, but as far as I can tell
this is a security release and the changelog doesn't mention any changes
19 matches
Mail list logo
