Erwan Velu wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Patricio A. Bruna wrote:
Hi,
Does cluster suite use Multicast in Red Hat 5?
If is so, how can i test my Switchs allow multicast traffic?
The switches that I tested allow multicast traffic by default.
You can test it by running some
Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
I am Downloaded the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 AS 30 Days
Evaluation copy and i Installed and testing the Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 4 Update 4 AS and i need the Cluster Suite for same
The Cluster Suite for same is not available in Red Hat Site
Please
Cliff Hones wrote:
I am using Centos5.1 with GNBD and GNBD fencing.
Is gnbd fencing supported for production environment?
I tried several fencing methods, including manual, san-switch,
blade-center, and ILO fencing, and so far the only reliable method based
on my experience are
Cliff Hones wrote:
While I can see that in a controlled production environment the
loss of a server node may be best handled by a forced (power)
reboot, it does seem unfortunate if this has to be done in,
say, an office environment when communication has been temporarily
lost eg while
2009/5/19 victory.xu july_s...@163.com:
the cluster system have run two months,but now the /file Partition is
hung,i reboot two server,then it is ok,but after some time,it is hung again
May 20 04:28:42 web01 kernel: sd 1:0:0:2: SCSI error: return code = 0x0007
May 20 04:28:42 web01
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Jon Schulz
jsch...@soapstonenetworks.com wrote:
I'm in the process of doing a concept review with the redhat cluster suite.
I've been given a requirement that cluster nodes are able to be located in
geographically separated data centers. I realize that this is
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, brem belgueblibrem.belgue...@gmail.com wrote:
We are in the same setup, already doing Geo-cluster with other technos and
we are looking at RHCS to provide us the same service level.
Usually the concepts are the same. What solution are you using? How
does it work,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Jin-Shan Tsengtsen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com
wrote:
gnbd has not been ported to any kernel 2.6.27 because it's been
deprecated upstream.
Fabio
Hi Fabio,
Thanks for your reply. :)
I'll use
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, FMdist-l...@lexum.umontreal.ca wrote:
Hello
2 of 3 of my xen nodes ( dom0) died tonight because of out of memory error.
These servers are only running Xen and cluster suite packages.
I googled the error and everything point out to dom0-min-mem and grub
dom0_mem
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Miguel Sanchezntad...@fi.upm.es wrote:
Hi. I have two hosts forming a cluster for run xen vm's. Each vm has a disk
which is corresponding to a clvm logic volume within dom0.
I pretended to backup the lv's from dom0 doing a 'kpart -a' and a readonly
mount (with
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Miguel Sanchezntad...@fi.upm.es wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha escribió:
Did you know that if you mount an ext3 partition READ ONLY you could
actually do a WRITE to that partition to replay the journal, and so
cause possible data corruption?
No, I don't
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Mathew, Gigi (JSC-EG)[Jacobs
Technology] gigi.mathe...@nasa.gov wrote:
Rafael:
Thanks for your reply. I believe NFS over GFS2 should be the solution.
Now I have a question about GFS performance fine tuning. Is there any
documents do you recommend?
Since
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Bai Shuwei baishu...@gmail.com wrote:
HI, everyone:
I am a begginer on FC-SAN. On my machine i have installed
HBAs(QLogic2342) and SLCI tools. How I can setup the lun masking to
forbidden/allow hosts to access special LUN/Disk? Do I need some other
speccial
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Rohit tripathi rohit2...@gmail.com wrote:
sir
pls help me to install high availeblity cluster in HP blader server
You could start with RHEL or Centos 5.5 and use this documentation:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Luis Cebamanos luic...@gmail.com wrote:
Is a cluster with 16 nodes and I suspect the problem is in the head node:
We were trying to install new hard drives to the system but something that
we don't know went wrong and it ended up in almost 4 years of work
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Shariq Siddiqui
shariq.siddi...@yahoo.comwrote:
Dear All,
This is Shariq Siddiqui
I am going to work with RHCS, so I need some good documentations related to
this to take a start.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Nikola Savic n...@logik-internet.rs wrote:
Hello,
I need to setup cluster of 3 servers without separate storage device
(SAN). Servers should join their local hard drives to create shared storage
space. Every server in cluster has public (100Mbps) and
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Nikola Savic wrote:
If I understand you well, even before sync is completely done DRBD
will take care of reading and writing of dirty blocks on problematic
node that got back online? Let's say that node was down for longer
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Nikola Savic n...@logik-internet.rs wrote:
Hello,
I need to setup cluster using 3 servers. Thanks to everybody involved from
this mailing list in previous post, we have concluded that DRBD+GFS2 is the
best approach for building shared storage from local
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Shariq Siddiqui
shariq.siddi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am going to install Oracle RAC on two Servers, With shared SAN storage
(Servers and Storage is IBM)
OS = RHEL 5u5 x64 bit
And we used multipathing mechanism and created multipathing devices.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Shariq Siddiqui
shariq.siddi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am going to install Oracle RAC on two Servers, With shared SAN storage
(Servers and Storage is IBM)
OS = RHEL 5u5 x64 bit
And we used multipathing mechanism and created multipathing devices.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bobby Cherian bcher...@softcell.in wrote:
Hi all,
May i know the link to download the RHEL 6.
That's not really a linux-cluster question, but you can try create a
RHN login and request trial on
https://www.redhat.com/rhel/details/eval/
Try might be some delay
Follow the link at the bottom of every mail you get from the list and
unsubscribe yourself
--
Fajar
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:30 AM, abhishek . abhishekf...@gmail.com wrote:
hello sir,
plz dont send me any more mails and remove my id from ur mailing list.
--
abhishek
--
Linux-cluster
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Alawi, Abraham
abraham.al...@team.telstra.com wrote:
GlusterFS is an awesome solution, provides HA performance but it has some
limited capabilities too, like it doesn’t support POSIX ACL. Lastly my
2cents for a clustered file system, it sounds like a sexy
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens if I shutdown all cluster services on the RHEL node,
remove it from the cluster and then simply create a new LVM
configuration (new pvs, vgs, lvs, etc) and cluster configuration on
the centos box and start over? Will
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Harvinder Singh Binder
jmd_singhsa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Good afternoon sir,
Please send me whole detail about cluster such as what
is cluster, requirement,configration etc
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=redhat+linux+cluster
--
Fajar
--
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:50 PM, dlugi dl...@forum-polska.com wrote:
Is it possible to build some kind of HPC cluster where this single process
could be distributed for several machines ?
No. That's not what HPC is all about.
--
Fajar
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Jankowski, Chris
chris.jankow...@hp.com wrote:
Only then, if the elapsed time of your processing is still unacceptably long
(weeks), you would move to a HPTC cluster. This is very expensive - the
Infiniband interconnects do not come cheap and you still need to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:40 PM, dlugi dl...@forum-polska.com wrote:
Ok I understand. Anyway thanks for explanation. My software is Blender. I
dont know why for such a thing like fluid dynamics somebody somebody coded
software without multithreading. I will ask on Blender forum maybe there is
2011/4/25 Devrim GÜNDÜZ fedora-l...@gunduz.org
Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with
active/passive cluster?
If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives more
performance compared to gfs(2).
--
FAN
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Jochen Schneider
jochen.schnei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are setting up a cluster for a storage application with SAN disks managed
through HA-LVM and connected through multipath. There are actually two
applications which have to run on the same node,
HAVE to
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jochen Schneider
jochen.schnei...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how much recovery can come out of a failover in case
of a SAN failure, if it's not both network cards of the node which are
defective or whatever.
Exactly :)
If no node can access the SAN,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, satya suresh kolapalli
kolapallisatya...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir,
I need a document how to link gfs to gnbd
Did you try Google?
http://sourceware.org/cluster/gnbd/gnbd_usage.txt
IIRC gnbd is not maintained anymore though. You'd probably have better
luck using a
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:38 PM, satya suresh kolapalli
kolapallisatya...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir,
In my office,there are 3 servers for postgressql database.
Out of three, two are running for postgressql database software and
one server for storage.
Those are in Red Hat Cluster.
I mean to
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/02/2012 12:24 AM, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
3.0.12: 11-May-2010
3.0.12.1: 27-May-2011
3.1.2: 16-Jun-2011
Wow, it looks like the cman guys have a strange idea on versioning... The
size
of changelogs is
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's not practical, am I left with building a new cluster from scratch?
I'm pretty sure if your ONLY problem is Skipping clustered volume
group vg_data01b, you can just turn off cluster flag with vgchange
-cn, then use -o
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jankowski, Chris
chris.jankow...@hp.com wrote:
I am curious why the designers of RHEV V3.0 did not use GFS2 for their
shared storage. It seems that this would be a natural choice. Instead RHEV
3.0 allows either NFS or raw shared LUNs, I believe.
Anybody has
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Rajendra Roka rajend...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I am looking for help in Redhat cluster not the third party heartbeat.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Rajendra Roka rajend...@gmail.com
wrote:
Currently we have mysql cluster running in RHEL
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Rajendra Roka rajend...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mean to use mixed system. I am currently using 2 node redhat cluster
in vmware with RDM. The reason behind this is high avaliabliy in MySQL. Not
sure how Vmware able to handle the high availabily in this case?
39 matches
Mail list logo
