* Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
>Hi, Sebastian,
Hi Huang,
sorry for the delay.
>I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
>interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
>is attached with the mail.
The new results are attached.
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:45:03PM +0800, Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:21:44PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > Hey, it works :))
> > Just not always, which is great at attracting Patrick and problems.
>
> I was more commenting on the bugs in the crypto
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:18:08PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Normally, kzalloc returns NULL or a valid pointer value, not a value to be
> tested using IS_ERR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch applied. Thanks Julia!
--
Visit
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:21:44PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> Hey, it works :))
> Just not always, which is great at attracting Patrick and problems.
I was more commenting on the bugs in the crypto layer that breaks
hifn rather than the hifn driver itself :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Normally, kzalloc returns NULL or a valid pointer value, not a value to be
tested using IS_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -u -p a/crypto/cryptd.c b/crypto/cryptd.c
--- a/crypto/cryptd.c 2008-04-16 13:27:56.0 +0200
++
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:59:32PM +0800, Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It's a good thing the hifn driver doesn't work yet :)
Hey, it works :))
Just not always, which is great at attracting Patrick and problems.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:09:39AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
I've attached two traces, the one from eseqiv and a similar
one from authenc (I've manually overriden eseqiv by chainiv
to test whether its responsible for the broken packets I was
seeing
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:09:39AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
I've attached two traces, the one from eseqiv and a similar
one from authenc (I've manually overriden eseqiv by chainiv
to test whether its responsible for the broken packets I was
seeing, which turned out to b
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Normally, kzalloc returns NULL or a valid pointer value, not a value to be
> tested using IS_ERR.
Ouch :)
> diff -u -p a/crypto/cryptd.c b/crypto/cryptd.c
> --- a/crypto/cryptd.c 2008-04-16 13:27:56.0
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:09:39AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> I've attached two traces, the one from eseqiv and a similar
> one from authenc (I've manually overriden eseqiv by chainiv
> to test whether its responsible for the broken packets I was
> seeing, which turned out to be the case. I
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Normally, kzalloc returns NULL or a valid pointer value, not a value to be
tested using IS_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -u -p a/crypto/cryptd.c b/crypto/cryptd.c
--- a/crypto/cryptd.c 2008-04-16 13:27:56.0 +0200
++
11 matches
Mail list logo
