On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:18:43PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> All the ciphers comply, so the bug is only a theroretical issue (but I
> didn't check assembler versions --- they should be checked by the person
> who wrote them, assembler is write-only language).
Since every current algorith
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
And where would you propose to place this bit?
One possibility would be struct crypto_tfm->crt_flags
Another possibility is struct crypto_alg->cra_flags
The latter definitely because th
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:09:38PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
> compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
> test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully
> by
Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2
compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self
test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully by
me
Regards
Neil
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tc
From: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:20:59 +0200
> Yes, that could be case. However a "manual" swap has three opcodes here,
> the le load has one. I should not end up with more code in the latter
> cases hould I?
You indeed can, because GCC has less information to
* David Miller | 2008-05-21 00:11:42 [-0700]:
>From: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:09:54 +0200
>
>> That was, what I expected as well but the numbers were different. I
>> checked the assembly code and I had the le loads but more code. I will
>> check with differe
From: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:09:54 +0200
> That was, what I expected as well but the numbers were different. I
> checked the assembly code and I had the le loads but more code. I will
> check with different compiler maybe it will get better here as well.
Y
* David Miller | 2008-05-20 19:47:23 [-0700]:
>From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I though you and Herbert are two different persons.
>Performance is significantly increased on Niagara2 by using
>the little-endian loads inside of the transformation loop, as
>expected. The numbers below are fi