On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 07:09 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:10:45AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > I would be interested to know how that goes. You always have this
> > circular issue that if a little more space helps significantly, then
> > maybe it is a good idea to expl
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 05:55:04PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> OK, fair enough, I applied Kirill's patch. Thanks.
Thanks Pekka!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~}
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herb
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:10:45AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> I would be interested to know how that goes. You always have this
> circular issue that if a little more space helps significantly, then
> maybe it is a good idea to explicitly ask for those bytes. Of course
> that larger allocation
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >
> > Because the API was being widely abused in the nommu code, for example.
> > I'd rather not add it back for this special case which can be handled
> > otherwise.
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 18:50 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I'm sorry b
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:18:46AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Here's a backtrace from the RCU stall detector on PS3:
> >
> > | INFO: RCU detected CPU 1 stall (t=4294906597/2500 jiffies)
> > | Call Trace:
> > | [cc186fc0] [c000f850]
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:01:24PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > When running "modprobe tcrypt mode=10" on ppc64 (PS3), I get the following
> > > error:
> > >
> > > | alg: skcipher: Test 8 failed on encryption for lrw(aes-gen
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Well with the netlink parameters these can have variable lengths
> > > depending on how many parameters the user supplies.
> >
> > How can this be exported to userspace?
> > How does
On Thursday 12 February 2009 21:50:34 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Because the API was being widely abused in the nommu code, for example.
> > I'd rather not add it back for this special case which can be handled
> > otherwise.
>
> I'm sorry
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
> On a powerpc box 2.6.29-rc4-git4 randconfig build fails with :
>
> CC [M] crypto/async_tx/async_xor.o
> crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c: In function async_xor_init:
> crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c:313: error: size of array type name is negative
> make[2]: *
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45:21PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Because the API was being widely abused in the nommu code, for example.
> I'd rather not add it back for this special case which can be handled
> otherwise.
I'm sorry but that's like banning the use of heaters just because
they can
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:06:53PM +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > Herbert, what do you think of this (untested) patch? Alternatively, we
> > could do something like kfree_secure() but it seems overkill for this one
> > call-site.
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 18:43 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I don't u
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:06:53PM +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
> Herbert, what do you think of this (untested) patch? Alternatively, we
> could do something like kfree_secure() but it seems overkill for this one
> call-site.
I don't understand why you want to limit the use of ksize. If
kmal
12 matches
Mail list logo
