Re: RFC: kcrypto - (yet another) user space interface

2010-06-11 Thread Phil Sutter
Hey Bigeasy, On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > please take look at [0] and [1]. From README I can tell that those two > posts are different from you have so far. Hmm. Indeed, using something like AF_CRYPTO didn't come to my mind so far. Though I'm not su

[RFC 9/9] crypto: Add Samsung crypto engine driver

2010-06-11 Thread Maurus Cuelenaere
This patch adds support for the Samsung crypto engine driver available in the S3C64XX and S5PC100 SoCs. Currently this supports AES and (T)DES with ECB and CBC block ciphers (also CTR for AES). Support for (HMAC)-SHA1 acceleration is also available in this engine, but isn't used in the driver yet.

[RFC/PATCH 0/9] Samsung crypto engine

2010-06-11 Thread Maurus Cuelenaere
Hi all, this patchset introduces crypto acceleration support for the crypto engine available in S3C64XX and S5PC100 SoC's. I only have access to a S3C6410 board so it would be nice if people could test these patches on S5PC100. The driver currently only supports AES and (T)DES in PIO mode, but ev

Re: RFC: kcrypto - (yet another) user space interface

2010-06-11 Thread Phil Sutter
Hey Bigeasy, On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > please take look at [0] and [1]. From README I can tell that those two > posts are different from you have so far. Hmm. Indeed, using something like AF_CRYPTO didn't come to my mind so far. Though I'm not su

Re: RFC: kcrypto - (yet another) user space interface

2010-06-11 Thread Phil Sutter
Hey, Seems like I'm stabbing into open wounds. :) First of all, thanks a lot for your comments. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos | 2010-06-11 09:47:15 [+0200]: > > >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> * Phil Sutter | 2010-06

Re: RFC: kcrypto - (yet another) user space interface

2010-06-11 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos | 2010-06-11 09:47:15 [+0200]: >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Phil Sutter | 2010-06-10 20:22:29 [+0200]: > >The problem with right or wrong is that they are only known afterwards. >For me the right way to go is _to go_. I can see discussions in this >least, years

Re: RFC: kcrypto - (yet another) user space interface

2010-06-11 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Phil Sutter | 2010-06-10 20:22:29 [+0200]: > >> Hello everyone, > Hi Phil, > > please take look at [0] and [1]. From README I can tell that those two > posts are different from you have so far. > You might want to take a look at AF_PACKET interface. It does ze