On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:07:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au
wrote:
* Kill testmgr warning for gcm-aes-aesni.
Hmm. You killed one of the warnings, but the setkey one remains.
alg: aead: setkey failed on
On 06/26/2015 10:56 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
Hit a warning when building QAT, indicating that sz_out might be uninitalized
before use. Looks like if you hit an error path and jump to err: you might
find
yourself trying to unmap an arbirarily long dma region. Its safe on intel
since
intel
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Herbert Xu
herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
So I think Tadeusz's patch is the simplest fix for 4.2. Could you
please test it to see if it makes your warning go away?
Seems to silence it here.
I get the feeling that the patch is still wrong - why are not
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2015, 12:19:32 schrieb Tadeusz Struk:
Hi Tadeusz,
On 06/25/2015 04:58 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
- how would a hardware implementation offering only a hybrid asym cipher
implementation (i.e. a full signature mechanism or bulk data encryption
mechanism) be
Hi Stephan,
On 06/27/2015 09:25 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Ok, in this case, it would mean that rsa would point to the software
implementation and oaep(rsa) would point to the hardware. Would I be correct?
All combinations are possible, and it is up to the implementation to decide.
Yes,
