Re: [PATCH v3] poly1305: generic C can be faster on chips with slow unaligned access

Hello friendly test robot, On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:27 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Jason, > > [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] That error was fixed by v4 in this series. The version that should be tested and ultimately applied is v4 and can be found here:

Re: [PATCH v3] poly1305: generic C can be faster on chips with slow unaligned access

Hi Jason, [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc4 next-2016] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH v3] crypto: arm64/sha2: integrate OpenSSL implementations of SHA256/SHA512

Hi Ard, On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:32:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > This integrates both the accelerated scalar and the NEON implementations > of SHA-224/256 as well as SHA-384/512 from the OpenSSL project. > > Relative performance compared to the respective generic C versions: > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. >> >> I will take this. > > Thanks a lot! >

Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64/sha2: integrate OpenSSL implementations of SHA256/SHA512

On 11 November 2016 at 20:56, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:51:13PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> This integrates both the accelerated scalar and the NEON implementations >> of SHA-224/256 as well as SHA-384/512 from the OpenSSL project. >> >> Relative