On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:28:43AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 11:22:34 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > > @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int _aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock,
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 11:22:34 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int _aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
> > msghdr *msg,>
> > size_t usedpages = 0; /* [in] RX bufs
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
>
> @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int _aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
> msghdr *msg,
> size_t usedpages = 0; /* [in] RX bufs to be used from user */
> size_t processed = 0; /* [in] TX bufs to
The wait for data is a non-atomic operation that can sleep and therefore
potentially release the socket lock. The release of the socket lock
allows another thread to modify the context data structure. The waiting
operation for new data therefore must be called at the beginning of
recvmsg. This
