Herbert Xu wrote:
> This was detected by the self-test thanks to Ard's chunking patch.
>
> I finally got around to testing this out on my ancient Via box. It
> turns out that the workaround got the assembly wrong and we end up
> doing count + initial cycles of the loop instead of just count.
>
This was detected by the self-test thanks to Ard's chunking patch.
I finally got around to testing this out on my ancient Via box. It
turns out that the workaround got the assembly wrong and we end up
doing count + initial cycles of the loop instead of just count.
This obviously causes
