* Huang Ying ying.hu...@intel.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 22:32 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
A cleanup request: mind creating two macros for this PSHUFB MMX/SSE
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:46:04PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Yeah. Or just a single block of:
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
...
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
around the C bits - anything outside that is good for assembly as well.
OK I'll throw this into cryptodev:
commit
On 11/03/2009 01:03 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
.macro xmm_num opd xmm
.ifc \xmm,%xmm0
\opd = 0
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm1
\opd = 1
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm2
\opd = 2
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm3
\opd = 3
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm4
\opd = 4
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm5
\opd = 5
.endif
.ifc \xmm,%xmm6
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
A cleanup request: mind creating two macros for this PSHUFB MMX/SSE
instruction in arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h, instead of open-coding the
.byte sequences in ~6 places?
I had a go at doing that, but it seems that i387.h isn't
* Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
A cleanup request: mind creating two macros for this PSHUFB MMX/SSE
instruction in arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h, instead of open-coding the
.byte sequences in ~6 places?
I
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:32:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Please use the standard construct and put an #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ around
it.
You mean like this?
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
index 0b20bbb..e22d237 100644
---
* Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:32:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Please use the standard construct and put an #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ around
it.
You mean like this?
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 22:32 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
A cleanup request: mind creating two macros for this PSHUFB MMX/SSE
instruction in arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 05:30:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
x86_64 allmodconfig, GNU assembler 2.16.1:
arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S:103: Error: no such instruction:
`pshufb %xmm5,%xmm0'
* Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
- pshufb BSWAP, DATA
+ # pshufb BSWAP, DATA
+ .byte 0x66, 0x0f, 0x38, 0x00, 0xc5
A cleanup request: mind creating two macros for this PSHUFB MMX/SSE
instruction in arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h, instead of open-coding the
.byte
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:53:33 +0900 Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:35:46AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
found at:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:35:46AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
found at:
PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
found at:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode/
Because PCLMULQDQ changes XMM state,
13 matches
Mail list logo
