From: Benoit Taine benoit.ta...@lip6.fr
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:26:47 +0200
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
`DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
This issue was reported by checkpatch.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
`DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
This issue was reported by checkpatch.
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
`DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:54:32AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id`