On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:27:53PM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
So, generally speaking I'm ok with most of this I think,
One open issue... I thought you had said that the non-determinsitic
version was not in the current X9.31 and I had the impression that it
wasn't wanted. I've got
Am Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2014, 15:27:53 schrieb George Spelvin:
Hi George,
but before it goes anywhere, it really needs to pass the NIST and FIPS
test vectors. Can you do that please and post the results?
It of course passes the ones in testmgr.h, and I can add the others from
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:33:14AM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
Thank you all for your hospitality to my amateurish efforts.
Given that this all started with me reading the code in an attempt to
understand it, it is likely that some of the problems I address are
actually misunderstandings on
So, generally speaking I'm ok with most of this I think,
One open issue... I thought you had said that the non-determinsitic
version was not in the current X9.31 and I had the impression that it
wasn't wanted. I've got reorganized patch series that gets rid of that
and just tweaks the comments.
Thank you all for your hospitality to my amateurish efforts.
Given that this all started with me reading the code in an attempt to
understand it, it is likely that some of the problems I address are
actually misunderstandings on my part. If all I get from this patch series
is some enlightenment,
