Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 17:24:09 schrieb Joe Perches:
Hi Joe,
> On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 02:15 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 17:09:33 schrieb Joe Perches:
> > > On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 01:57 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > And I also get the same output. Yet I am
On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 02:15 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 17:09:33 schrieb Joe Perches:
> > On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 01:57 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > And I also get the same output. Yet I am not sure how that code can be
> > > compared to the code in the kernel.
>
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 17:09:33 schrieb Joe Perches:
Hi Joe,
> On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 01:57 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > And I also get the same output. Yet I am not sure how that code can be
> > compared to the code in the kernel.
>
> What that code shows is that the ARRAY_SIZE
> type is
On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 01:57 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> And I also get the same output. Yet I am not sure how that code can be
> compared to the code in the kernel.
What that code shows is that the ARRAY_SIZE
type is size_t.
The difference is ARRAY_SIZE in the kernel
should be output with %z
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 09:57:20 schrieb Joe Perches:
Hi Joe,
> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 14:21 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:53:19PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 05:46 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 sc
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 14:21 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:53:19PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 05:46 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> > >
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > > Hi Stephan
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:53:19PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 05:46 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> >
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > > Hi Stephan,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Mueller
>
Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014, 20:53:19 schrieb Joe Perches:
Hi Joe,
> On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 05:46 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> >
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > > Hi Stephan,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Muelle
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 05:46 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> > Hi Stephan,
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Mueller
> wrote:
> > > @@ -1987,8 +1987,9 @@ static int __init drbg_init(void)
> > >
>
Am Sonntag, 29. Juni 2014, 12:24:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi Stephen,
> Hi Stephan,
>
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Mueller
wrote:
> > @@ -1987,8 +1987,9 @@ static int __init drbg_init(void)
> >
> > if (ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_cores) * 2 > ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_algs)) {
> >
> >
Hi Stephan,
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> @@ -1987,8 +1987,9 @@ static int __init drbg_init(void)
>
> if (ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_cores) * 2 > ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_algs)) {
> pr_info("DRBG: Cannot register all DRBG types"
> - "(slots ne
The initial format strings caused warnings on several architectures. The
updated format strings now match the variable types.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller
---
crypto/drbg.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
12 matches
Mail list logo