On 6 May 2014 16:43, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 4aef42a04bdc..86ac6a9bc86a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:48:08PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 6 May 2014 16:43, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:12:55PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:48:08PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 6 May 2014 16:43, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git
There are two tacit assumptions in the FPSIMD handling code that will no longer
hold after the next patch that optimizes away some FPSIMD state restores:
. the FPSIMD registers of this CPU contain the userland FPSIMD state of
task 'current';
. when switching to a task, its FPSIMD state will
