On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to feed it to stable?
I already added stable Cc's so it should go in automatically once
it's pushed to Linus.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gon
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:04:19 +0100
Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 24. November 2017, 08:37:39 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:20:55PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> > > so
Am Freitag, 24. November 2017, 08:37:39 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:20:55PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> > socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
> > e
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:20:55PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
> even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock
> can be safely i
2017-11-10 13:20 GMT+01:00 Stephan Müller :
> The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
> even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock
> can be safely ignored.
>
> This fix
The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock
can be safely ignored.
This fixes a bug regarding scheduling in atomic as the callback
