Hi Jarkko,
On 18 January 2018 at 21:50, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 07:43:51PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 14 November 2017 at 20:02, Jarkko Sakkinen
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 07:43:51PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On 14 November 2017 at 20:02, Jarkko Sakkinen
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:53:35AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> >> Did basic check on tpm rng
Hi Jarkko,
On 14 November 2017 at 20:02, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:53:35AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
>> Did basic check on tpm rng patch, it works fine. As it depends on this
>> patch this should be working fine too.
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:53:35AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Did basic check on tpm rng patch, it works fine. As it depends on this
> patch this should be working fine too.
>
> Tested-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
>
> Regards,
> PrasannaKumar
Thank
Did basic check on tpm rng patch, it works fine. As it depends on this
patch this should be working fine too.
Tested-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Regards,
PrasannaKumar
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:54:50PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Device number (the character device index) is not a stable identifier
> for a TPM chip. That is the reason why every call site passes
> TPM_ANY_NUM to tpm_chip_find_get().
>
> This commit changes the API in a way that instead a
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:57:12PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
wrote:
> I do not what value my rb tag provides as I have not contributed code
> to it before. Is it encouraged by kernel community?
Yes. People will judge the quality of your rb tag based on other
reviews they have seen you
On 26 October 2017 at 21:39, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 07:40:49PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 26 October 2017 at 19:24, Jarkko Sakkinen
>> wrote:
>> > Device number (the
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 07:40:49PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On 26 October 2017 at 19:24, Jarkko Sakkinen
> wrote:
> > Device number (the character device index) is not a stable identifier
> > for a TPM chip. That is the reason why
Hi Jarkko,
On 26 October 2017 at 19:24, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
> Device number (the character device index) is not a stable identifier
> for a TPM chip. That is the reason why every call site passes
> TPM_ANY_NUM to tpm_chip_find_get().
>
> This commit changes
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:54:50PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Device number (the character device index) is not a stable identifier
> for a TPM chip. That is the reason why every call site passes
> TPM_ANY_NUM to tpm_chip_find_get().
>
> This commit changes the API in a way that instead a
11 matches
Mail list logo