On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Locktyukhin, Maxim
maxim.locktyuk...@intel.com wrote:
20 (and more) cycles per byte shown below are not reasonable numbers for SHA-1
- ~6 c/b (as can be seen in some of the results for Core2) is the expected
results ...
Ten years ago, on Pentium II, one
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:07 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
The previous implementation required the workspace to be passed in as
a parameter. This prevents the compiler from being able to store the
workspace in registers. I've also removed the memset since that also
prevents the compiler
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mandeep Singh Baines m...@chromium.org wrote:
There is no loss of security due to removing the memset. It would be a
bug for the stack to leak to userspace. However, a defence-in-depth
argument could be made for keeping the clearing of the workspace.
So I'm
Joe Perches (j...@perches.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:07 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
The previous implementation required the workspace to be passed in as
a parameter. This prevents the compiler from being able to store the
workspace in registers. I've also removed the
