Re: [PATCH] crypto: remove double execution of the same test suite
On 7/18/2013 6:57 PM, Cristian Stoica wrote: This patch removes redundant execution of the same test suite in cases where alg and driver variables are the same (e.g. when alg_test is called from tcrypt_test) Signed-off-by: Cristian Stoica cristian.sto...@freescale.com Reviewed-by: Horia Geanta horia.gea...@freescale.com --- crypto/testmgr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/crypto/testmgr.c b/crypto/testmgr.c index 2f00607..e091ef6 100644 --- a/crypto/testmgr.c +++ b/crypto/testmgr.c @@ -3234,7 +3234,7 @@ int alg_test(const char *driver, const char *alg, u32 type, u32 mask) if (i = 0) rc |= alg_test_descs[i].test(alg_test_descs + i, driver, type, mask); - if (j = 0) + if (j = 0 j != i) rc |= alg_test_descs[j].test(alg_test_descs + j, driver, type, mask); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 04:44:20 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 07/18/2013 03:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: alias x86cpu:vendor:*:family:*:model:*:feature:*0081* crct10dif_pclmul This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during development on 3.10 and the module was indeed loaded. However, I found that the following commit under 3.11-rc1 broke the mechanism after some bisection. commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc Author: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200 ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. Rafael, can you check and see if this can be fixed so those optimized crypto modules for Intel cpu that support them can be loaded? I think this is an ordering issue between udev startup and the time when devices are registered. I wonder what happens if you put those modules into the initramfs image? OK, this bothers me on some pretty deep level... a set of changes exclusively in drivers/acpi breaking functionality which had nothing to do with ACPI, specifically CPU-feature-based module loading. Well, they are not exclusively in drivers/acpi, they are in drivers/base/cpu.c too and that most likely is the responsible part. Please let me know what the investigation comes up with, or if I need to get more directly involved. I will. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu
support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during
development on 3.10 and the module was indeed loaded.
However, I found that the following commit under 3.11-rc1 broke
the mechanism after some bisection.
commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200
ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
existing processor driver functionality.
Rafael, can you check and see if this can be fixed so those optimized
crypto modules for Intel cpu that support them can be loaded?
I think this is an ordering issue between udev startup and the time
when
devices are registered.
Something that can be fixed?
I'm sure it can be fixes, but I'm not sure whether it's a udev bug or real
breakage in the kernel yet. I need to figure out that part.
OK
I wonder if the appended patch makes the issue go away for you?
Rafael, the patch did fix the cpu feature based module loading issue.
Thanks for your quick response.
Herbert, the patch below should fix the boot failure issue.
I also added the change to rename crct10dif.c to crct10dif_generic.c
and added MODULE_ALIAS(crct10dif) to crct10dif_generic.c.
This was according to our discussion:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/21/216
However, when I have the
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y
combination, the crc-t10dif library function was still
initialized before the crct10dif-pclmul.ko was loaded,
leading to the generic version being used. This
is also one of Tetsuo's concerns. In theory, loading
the generic version should also load the pclmul version as
they have the same MODULE_ALIAS, before crc-t10dif library
try to allocate the crypto transform.
Something else that I'm missing and need to be changed?
I will be away for a week without internet access so my
response will be slow.
Thanks.
Tim
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
---
Fix boot failure as crc-t10dif library may not cause crct10dif.ko
containing the generic algorithm to be loaded.
Rename crct10dif.c to crct10dif_generic.c and add module alias.
This should load all the modules supporting crct10dif algorithm
at the same time.
---
crypto/Makefile | 2 +-
crypto/{crct10dif.c = crct10dif_generic.c} | 1 +
lib/crc-t10dif.c| 3 ++-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename crypto/{crct10dif.c = crct10dif_generic.c} (99%)
diff --git a/crypto/Makefile b/crypto/Makefile
index 2d5ed08..3fd76fa 100644
--- a/crypto/Makefile
+++ b/crypto/Makefile
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB) += zlib.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC) += michael_mic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C) += crc32c.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF) += crct10dif.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF) += crct10dif_generic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC) += authenc.o authencesn.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO) += lzo.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZ4) += lz4.o
diff --git a/crypto/crct10dif.c b/crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
similarity index 99%
rename from crypto/crct10dif.c
rename to crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
index 92aca96..45a9acd 100644
--- a/crypto/crct10dif.c
+++ b/crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
@@ -176,3 +176,4 @@ module_exit(crct10dif_mod_fini);
MODULE_AUTHOR(Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(T10 DIF CRC calculation.);
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
+MODULE_ALIAS(crct10dif);
diff --git a/lib/crc-t10dif.c b/lib/crc-t10dif.c
index d102d83..37b3eb4 100644
--- a/lib/crc-t10dif.c
+++ b/lib/crc-t10dif.c
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
#include linux/init.h
#include crypto/hash.h
-static struct crypto_shash *crct10dif_tfm;
+__u16 crc_t10dif_generic(__u16 crc, const unsigned char *buffer, size_t len);
+static struct crypto_shash *crct10dif_tfm = crc_t10dif_generic;
__u16 crc_t10dif(const unsigned char *buffer, size_t len)
{
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Friday, July 19, 2013 11:08:49 AM Tim Chen wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during development on 3.10 and the module was indeed loaded. However, I found that the following commit under 3.11-rc1 broke the mechanism after some bisection. commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc Author: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200 ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. Rafael, can you check and see if this can be fixed so those optimized crypto modules for Intel cpu that support them can be loaded? I think this is an ordering issue between udev startup and the time when devices are registered. Something that can be fixed? I'm sure it can be fixes, but I'm not sure whether it's a udev bug or real breakage in the kernel yet. I need to figure out that part. OK I wonder if the appended patch makes the issue go away for you? Rafael, the patch did fix the cpu feature based module loading issue. Thanks for your quick response. Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply. With that patch applied, new device objects are created to avoid binding the processor driver directly to the cpu system device objects, because that apparently confuses udev and it starts to ignore the cpu modalias once the driver has been bound to any of those objects. I've verified in the meantime that this indeed is the case. A link to the patch in question: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/ Greg, I asked you some time ago whether or not it was possible for udev to stop autoloading modules that matched the cpu modalias after a driver had been bound to the cpu system device objects and you said no. However, this time I can say with certainty that that really is the case. So, the question now is whether or not we can do anything in the kernel to avoid that confusion in udev instead of applying the patch linked above (which is beyond ugly in my not so humble opinion)? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply. With that patch applied, new device objects are created to avoid binding the processor driver directly to the cpu system device objects, because that apparently confuses udev and it starts to ignore the cpu modalias once the driver has been bound to any of those objects. I've verified in the meantime that this indeed is the case. A link to the patch in question: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/ Greg, I asked you some time ago whether or not it was possible for udev to stop autoloading modules that matched the cpu modalias after a driver had been bound to the cpu system device objects and you said no. However, this time I can say with certainty that that really is the case. So, the question now is whether or not we can do anything in the kernel to avoid that confusion in udev instead of applying the patch linked above (which is beyond ugly in my not so humble opinion)? udev isn't doing any module loading, 'modprobe' is just being called for any new module alias that shows up in the system, and all of the drivers that match it then get loaded. How is it a problem if a module is attempted to be loaded that is already loaded? How is it a problem if a different module is loaded for a device already bound to a driver? Both of those should be total no-ops for the kernel. But, I don't know anything about the cpu code, how is loading a module causing problems? That sounds like it needs to be fixes, as any root user can load modules whenever they want, you can't protect the kernel from doing that. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On 07/19/2013 04:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: udev isn't doing any module loading, 'modprobe' is just being called for any new module alias that shows up in the system, and all of the drivers that match it then get loaded. How is it a problem if a module is attempted to be loaded that is already loaded? How is it a problem if a different module is loaded for a device already bound to a driver? Both of those should be total no-ops for the kernel. But, I don't know anything about the cpu code, how is loading a module causing problems? That sounds like it needs to be fixes, as any root user can load modules whenever they want, you can't protect the kernel from doing that. The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g. crct10dif_pclmul). RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:21:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 07/19/2013 04:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: udev isn't doing any module loading, 'modprobe' is just being called for any new module alias that shows up in the system, and all of the drivers that match it then get loaded. How is it a problem if a module is attempted to be loaded that is already loaded? How is it a problem if a different module is loaded for a device already bound to a driver? Both of those should be total no-ops for the kernel. But, I don't know anything about the cpu code, how is loading a module causing problems? That sounds like it needs to be fixes, as any root user can load modules whenever they want, you can't protect the kernel from doing that. The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g. crct10dif_pclmul). RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module. Then there's nothing to be done in udev or kmod, right? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:21:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g. crct10dif_pclmul). RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module. I think for crypto the simplest solution is to not do CPUID-based loading. Then crypto users will simply load the module alias which causes modprobe to load all modules providing that alias. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On 07/19/2013 04:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module. Then there's nothing to be done in udev or kmod, right? I don't know. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 09:24 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:21:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g. crct10dif_pclmul). RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module. I think for crypto the simplest solution is to not do CPUID-based loading. Then crypto users will simply load the module alias which causes modprobe to load all modules providing that alias. Cheers, Herbert, I've tried the module alias approach (see my earlier mail with patch) but it didn't seem to load things properly. Can you check to see if there's anything I did incorrectly. Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Friday, July 19, 2013 04:16:30 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply. With that patch applied, new device objects are created to avoid binding the processor driver directly to the cpu system device objects, because that apparently confuses udev and it starts to ignore the cpu modalias once the driver has been bound to any of those objects. I've verified in the meantime that this indeed is the case. A link to the patch in question: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/ Greg, I asked you some time ago whether or not it was possible for udev to stop autoloading modules that matched the cpu modalias after a driver had been bound to the cpu system device objects and you said no. However, this time I can say with certainty that that really is the case. So, the question now is whether or not we can do anything in the kernel to avoid that confusion in udev instead of applying the patch linked above (which is beyond ugly in my not so humble opinion)? udev isn't doing any module loading, 'modprobe' is just being called for any new module alias that shows up in the system, and all of the drivers that match it then get loaded. The problem is that that doesn't happen when a driver is bound to the cpu system device objects. modprobe is just not called for modules that match the cpu modalias in that case. If I call modprobe manually for any of the modules in question, it loads and works no problem. How is it a problem if a module is attempted to be loaded that is already loaded? How is it a problem if a different module is loaded for a device already bound to a driver? Both of those should be total no-ops for the kernel. Precisely, but that's not what happens in practice, hence my question. The situation is this: - With 3.11-rc1 modules that match the CPU modalias are not loaded automatically (that is, modprobe is not called for them by udev) after the processor module is loaded. - With 3.10 they are loaded automatically at any time. - With the patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/ on top of 3.11-rc1 the situation is the same as for 3.10. Therefore we have a kernel regression from 3.10 (with respect to the existing user space which is udev) in 3.11-rc1 3.10 and the patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/ makes that regression go away. However, that patch is totally voodoo programming, so I wonder if there is any saner alternative or we really need to do voodoo programming in the kernel to work around udev's confusion. But, I don't know anything about the cpu code, how is loading a module causing problems? That sounds like it needs to be fixes, as any root user can load modules whenever they want, you can't protect the kernel from doing that. Yes, that needs to be fixed, but I don't know *why* it is a problem in the first place. I'd like to understand what's going on, because I don't right now. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:37 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 09:24 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:21:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
The issue here seems to be the dynamic binding nature of the crypto
subsystem. When something needs crypto, it will request the appropriate
crypto module (e.g. crct10dif), which may race with detecting a specific
hardware accelerator based on CPUID or device information (e.g.
crct10dif_pclmul).
RAID has effectively the same issue, and we just solved it by
compiling in all the accelerators into the top-level module.
I think for crypto the simplest solution is to not do CPUID-based
loading. Then crypto users will simply load the module alias which
causes modprobe to load all modules providing that alias.
Cheers,
Herbert,
I've tried the module alias approach (see my earlier mail with patch)
but it didn't seem to load things properly. Can you check to see if
there's anything I did incorrectly.
Tim
I fixed a missing request_module statement in crct10dif library.
So now things work if I have the following config:
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=m
However, when I have the library and generic algorithm compiled in,
I do not see the PCLMULQDQ version loaded.
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y
Perhaps I am initiating the crct10dif library at a really early
stage when things are compiled in, where the module is not in
initramfs? In that case, perhaps we should only allow
PCLMUL version to be compiled in
and not exist as a module?
Here's the patch I tried:
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com
---
arch/x86/crypto/crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c | 8 +---
crypto/Makefile | 2 +-
crypto/{crct10dif.c = crct10dif_generic.c} | 1 +
lib/crc-t10dif.c| 1 +
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
rename crypto/{crct10dif.c = crct10dif_generic.c} (99%)
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c
b/arch/x86/crypto/crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c
index 7845d7f..7ad5f09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/crct10dif-pclmul_glue.c
@@ -121,15 +121,9 @@ static struct shash_alg alg = {
}
};
-static const struct x86_cpu_id crct10dif_cpu_id[] = {
- X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ),
- {}
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, crct10dif_cpu_id);
-
static int __init crct10dif_intel_mod_init(void)
{
- if (!x86_match_cpu(crct10dif_cpu_id))
+ if (!cpu_has_pclmulqdq)
return -ENODEV;
return crypto_register_shash(alg);
diff --git a/crypto/Makefile b/crypto/Makefile
index 2d5ed08..3fd76fa 100644
--- a/crypto/Makefile
+++ b/crypto/Makefile
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB) += zlib.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC) += michael_mic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C) += crc32c.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF) += crct10dif.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF) += crct10dif_generic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC) += authenc.o authencesn.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO) += lzo.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZ4) += lz4.o
diff --git a/crypto/crct10dif.c b/crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
similarity index 99%
rename from crypto/crct10dif.c
rename to crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
index 92aca96..c960a95 100644
--- a/crypto/crct10dif.c
+++ b/crypto/crct10dif_generic.c
@@ -176,3 +176,4 @@ module_exit(crct10dif_mod_fini);
MODULE_AUTHOR(Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(T10 DIF CRC calculation.);
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
+MODULE_ALIAS(crct10dif);
diff --git a/lib/crc-t10dif.c b/lib/crc-t10dif.c
index fe3428c..d8cd353 100644
--- a/lib/crc-t10dif.c
+++ b/lib/crc-t10dif.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(crc_t10dif);
static int __init crc_t10dif_mod_init(void)
{
+ request_module(crct10dif);
crct10dif_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(crct10dif, 0, 0);
return PTR_RET(crct10dif_tfm);
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to moduledependency.
Tim Chen wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:37 -0700, Tim Chen wrote: Herbert, I've tried the module alias approach (see my earlier mail with patch) but it didn't seem to load things properly. Can you check to see if there's anything I did incorrectly. Tim I fixed a missing request_module statement in crct10dif library. So now things work if I have the following config: CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=m However, when I have the library and generic algorithm compiled in, I do not see the PCLMULQDQ version loaded. CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y Perhaps I am initiating the crct10dif library at a really early stage when things are compiled in, where the module is not in initramfs? In that case, perhaps we should only allow PCLMUL version to be compiled in and not exist as a module? I think that use of request_module(crct10dif) does not help loading crct10dif-pclmul.ko when CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m , for there is no / directory (note that the initramfs is not yet mounted as / for loading modules which are not in vmlinux) when any module_init() functions which are in vmlinux are called. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 02:00:44 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, July 19, 2013 04:16:30 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply.
With that patch applied, new device objects are created to avoid binding
the
processor driver directly to the cpu system device objects, because that
apparently confuses udev and it starts to ignore the cpu modalias once the
driver has been bound to any of those objects.
I've verified in the meantime that this indeed is the case.
A link to the patch in question:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2830561/
Greg, I asked you some time ago whether or not it was possible for udev
to stop
autoloading modules that matched the cpu modalias after a driver had been
bound
to the cpu system device objects and you said no. However, this time I
can
say with certainty that that really is the case. So, the question now is
whether or not we can do anything in the kernel to avoid that confusion
in udev
instead of applying the patch linked above (which is beyond ugly in my
not so
humble opinion)?
udev isn't doing any module loading, 'modprobe' is just being called for
any new module alias that shows up in the system, and all of the drivers
that match it then get loaded.
The problem is that that doesn't happen when a driver is bound to the
cpu system device objects. modprobe is just not called for modules that
match the cpu modalias in that case.
If I call modprobe manually for any of the modules in question, it loads
and works no problem.
OK, I know what's up. udev has no rule that would allow it to load stuff on
the basis of MODALIAS if DRIVER is set in the event properties.
So, the following rule needs to be added to udev rules for things to work
as before:
DRIVER==processor, ENV{MODALIAS}==?*, IMPORT{builtin}=kmod load
$env{MODALIAS}
To be precise, I added a file called 80-drivers.rules to /etc/udev/rules.d/
with the following contents:
ACTION==remove, GOTO=drivers_end
DRIVER==processor, ENV{MODALIAS}==?*, IMPORT{builtin}=kmod load
$env{MODALIAS}
LABEL=drivers_end
but I'm not sure how to propagate this to the udev maintainers.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:31:04PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: However, when I have the library and generic algorithm compiled in, I do not see the PCLMULQDQ version loaded. CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y That is completely expected. I don't really think we need to do anything about this case. After all, if the admin wants to use the optimised version for CRC_T10DIF then they could simply compile that in as well. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to moduledependency.
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:31:04PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
However, when I have the library and generic algorithm compiled in,
I do not see the PCLMULQDQ version loaded.
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=y
That is completely expected. I don't really think we need to
do anything about this case. After all, if the admin wants to
use the optimised version for CRC_T10DIF then they could simply
compile that in as well.
Wow! ;-)
But I'd expect something like
static int __init crc_t10dif_mod_init(void)
{
+#if !defined(CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF_MODULE)
defined(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL_MODULE)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING Consider CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_PCLMUL=y for
better performance\n);
+#endif
crct10dif_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(crct10dif, 0, 0);
return PTR_RET(crct10dif_tfm);
}
because the admin might not be aware of this implication.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
