Mimi Zohar writes:
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 13:16 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> David Howells writes:
>> > The module signing patches provide:
>> >
>> > - Some fixes to Rusty's patch. Also an additional patch to extend the
>> > policy
>> >handling for modules signed with an unknown key an
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> You previously wrote:
>> You can't compare them that easily. One has a FIPS-mode panic and the other
>> doesn't. Do we want to panic if we reject an unsigned module in enforcing
>> mode when we're in FIPS mode?
>
> It's a line ball, but I t
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modpost b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
index 90b1bb1..2a4d1a1 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.modpost
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
@@ -165,11 +165,13 @@ endif
# We strip the module as best we can - note that using both strip and eu-strip
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
diff --git a/scripts/sign-file b/scripts/sign-file
index 1a472bb..e58e34e 100644
--- a/scripts/sign-file
+++ b/scripts/sign-file
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ scripts=`dirname $0`
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA512=y
if [ -r .config ]
then
-source ./.config
+. ./.config
fi
k
David Howells writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Could you pull my tree?
>
> David
> ---
>
> The following changes since commit eeea3ac912207dcf759b95b2b4c36f96bce583bf:
>
> Merge tag 'fixes-for-linus' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc (2012-09-06
> 10:23:58 -0700)
>
> are a
David Howells writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Could you pull my tree?
And after those three fixes, I still get all fail:
[3.361036] Request for unknown module key 'Magrathea: Glacier signing key: 6
e03943da0f3b015ba6ed7f5e0cac4fe48680994' err -11
rusty@rusty-x201:~/devel/kernel/linux (tmp-merge)$
From: Wei Yongjun
Convert cpu_to_be16(be16_to_cpu(E1) + E2) to use be16_add_cpu().
dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
(https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
drivers/crypto/talitos.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
On 09/27/2012 03:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
Version 2
This version of the patch series fixes compilation errors for
32 bit x86 targets.
Version 1
This patch series optimized CRC32C calculations with PCLMULQDQ
instruction for crc32c-intel module. It speeds up the original
implementation by 1.6x for
This patch adds a test case in tcrypt to perform speed test for
crc32c checksum calculation.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen
---
crypto/tcrypt.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
index 581081d..6deb77f 100644
--- a/crypto/tcrypt
This patch renames the crc32c-intel.c file to crc32c-intel_glue.c file
in preparation for linking with the new crc32c-pcl-intel-asm.S file,
which contains optimized crc32c calculation based on PCLMULQDQ
instruction.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen
---
arch/x86/crypto/Makefile |
Version 2
This version of the patch series fixes compilation errors for
32 bit x86 targets.
Version 1
This patch series optimized CRC32C calculations with PCLMULQDQ
instruction for crc32c-intel module. It speeds up the original
implementation by 1.6x for 1K buffer and by 3x for buffer 4k or
more.
This patch adds the crc_pcl function that calculates CRC32C checksum using the
PCLMULQDQ instruction on processors that support this feature. This will
provide speedup over using CRC32 instruction only.
The usage of PCLMULQDQ necessitate the invocation of kernel_fpu_begin and
kernel_fpu_end and inc
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:42:15AM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote:
> On 9/27/2012 11:14 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:01:50AM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote:
> >>
> >>Again, this patch (e46e9a) is not the culprit, it merely exposes the
> >>deficiencies in the talitos driver.
> >>AFAICT,
Hi Rusty,
Could you pull my tree?
David
---
The following changes since commit eeea3ac912207dcf759b95b2b4c36f96bce583bf:
Merge tag 'fixes-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc (2012-09-06 10:23:58
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://
On 9/27/2012 11:14 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:01:50AM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote:
Again, this patch (e46e9a) is not the culprit, it merely exposes the
deficiencies in the talitos driver.
AFAICT, these cases (zero assoc data, noncontiguous iv and assoc
data) have never been
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:01:50AM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote:
>
> Again, this patch (e46e9a) is not the culprit, it merely exposes the
> deficiencies in the talitos driver.
> AFAICT, these cases (zero assoc data, noncontiguous iv and assoc
> data) have never been handled correctly in the driver.
O
On 9/27/2012 8:25 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:53:37PM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote:
Hi Herbert,
I know these patches come late and might not be included in 3.6.
But two of them are already sitting in cryptodev tree for some time.
(Don't know where my head was :/).
I'm hesita
17 matches
Mail list logo
