Re: LZO irreversible output?

2010-02-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote: Hi all. (Not sent to LKML yesterday; no reply from linux-crypto yet, so resending). A while back now, I stopped supplying the LZF compression algorithm with TuxOnIce and made LZO the default algorithm. Around the same time, we started

Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.

2013-07-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 04:44:20 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 07/18/2013 03:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: alias x86cpu:vendor:*:family:*:model:*:feature:*0081* crct10dif_pclmul This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code

Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.

2013-07-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 19, 2013 11:08:49 AM Tim Chen wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during development on 3.10

Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.

2013-07-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 19, 2013 04:16:30 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply. With that patch applied, new device objects are created to avoid binding the processor driver directly to the cpu

Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.

2013-07-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 02:00:44 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, July 19, 2013 04:16:30 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Alas, this is not the one I'd like to apply. With that patch applied, new device objects

Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.

2013-07-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 05:06:29 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, July 20, 2013 02:00:44 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, July 19, 2013 04:16:30 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Alas, this is not the one I'd

Re: [RFC V4 PATCH 00/15] Signature verification of hibernate snapshot

2013-10-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, September 15, 2013 08:56:46 AM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: Hi experts, This patchset is the implementation for signature verification of hibernate snapshot image. The origin idea is from Jiri Kosina: Let EFI bootloader generate key-pair in UEFI secure boot environment, then pass it to

Re: [V6 PATCH 0/7] ACPI: Introduce support for _CCA object

2015-06-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) I've queued up the series for 4.2, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
); + Well, so is this going to work for PCI too after all? acpi_physnode_link_name(physical_node_name, node_id); retval = sysfs_create_link(acpi_dev-dev.kobj, dev-kobj, physical_node_name); -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 22, 2015 07:15:17 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: On 5/22/2015 6:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, May 22, 2015 05:24:15 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Not sure if this went out earlier. So I am resending. On 5/22/15 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: diff --git

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 22, 2015 05:24:15 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Not sure if this went out earlier. So I am resending. On 5/22/15 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c index 39c485b..b9657af 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c +++ b/drivers

Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn

2017-02-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older > pr_warning in the kernel source tree. > > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. > > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate >

Re: [PATCH v4 23/27] x86_64: assembly, change all ENTRY+ENDPROC to SYM_FUNC_*

2017-10-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
lt;herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> > Cc: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> > Cc: Matt Fleming <m...@code

Re: PBKDF2 support in the linux kernel

2018-05-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:57:37 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018, 04:45:00 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers: > > Hi Eric, > > > > > "Not having to rely on any third-party library" is not an excuse to add > > random code to the kernel, which runs in a privileged context.

Re: PBKDF2 support in the linux kernel

2018-05-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:11:32 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018, 10:33:07 CEST schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > Hi Rafael, Hi Stephan, > > So the problem is that Yu would like to use this for hibernation encryption > > done entirely in the ke

Re: PBKDF2 support in the linux kernel

2018-05-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:36:04 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018, 11:27:56 CEST schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > Hi Rafael, > > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:11:32 AM CEST Stephan Mueller wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018, 10:

Re: PBKDF2 support in the linux kernel

2018-05-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, May 26, 2018 7:12:36 AM CEST Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:00:40AM +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > > Hi all, > > The request is that, we'd like to generate a symmetric key derived from > > user provided passphase(not rely on any third-party library). May I know if > > there

Re: [PATCH v6 10/18] x86/power/64: Remove VLA usage

2018-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this > removes the discouraged use of AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK by switching to > shash directly and allocating the descriptor in heap memory (which should > be fine: the tfm has