Re: [PATCH] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-02 Thread Romain Perier

Hello,

Le 02/12/2016 à 09:58, Romain Perier a écrit :

Hi,

Le 01/12/2016 à 17:27, Gregory CLEMENT a écrit :

Hi Romain,

 On jeu., déc. 01 2016, Romain Perier
 wrote:


No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
from the step function.



Does this patch fix a bug ot it is jsute a cleanup/improvement?

If it is a bug you should CC stable and add use the Fixes tag.

Gregory



No, it just removes a initialization that is done twice. I have checked,
it cannot overwrite the context of the operation that was previously
copied (by the for loop), so it does not fix anything.




Well, I have a second fix that depends on this one. The second fix
will be marked as "Fixes" (to be backported to stable) so it would 
introduce a ordering issue. I think that I will resend a patch series 
with these two patches and tag both as "Fixes". Please ignore this patch 
for now.



Regards,
Romain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-02 Thread Romain Perier

Hi,

Le 01/12/2016 à 17:27, Gregory CLEMENT a écrit :

Hi Romain,

 On jeu., déc. 01 2016, Romain Perier  wrote:


No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
from the step function.



Does this patch fix a bug ot it is jsute a cleanup/improvement?

If it is a bug you should CC stable and add use the Fixes tag.

Gregory



No, it just removes a initialization that is done twice. I have checked, 
it cannot overwrite the context of the operation that was previously 
copied (by the for loop), so it does not fix anything.


Romain

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-01 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
Hi Romain,
 
 On jeu., déc. 01 2016, Romain Perier  wrote:

> No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
> from the step function.
>

Does this patch fix a bug ot it is jsute a cleanup/improvement?

If it is a bug you should CC stable and add use the Fixes tag.

Gregory

> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier 
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request 
> *req)
>   for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
>   writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
>  
> - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, >op_tmpl);
> - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, >op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
> -
>   if (creq->cache_ptr)
>   memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
>   creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr);
> -- 
> 2.9.3
>

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-01 Thread Romain Perier
No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
from the step function.

Signed-off-by: Romain Perier 
---
 drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request 
*req)
for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
 
-   mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, >op_tmpl);
-   memcpy_toio(engine->sram, >op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
-
if (creq->cache_ptr)
memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr);
-- 
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html