On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:57:54PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> After checking all possible call chains to kzalloc here,
> my tool finds that this kzalloc is never called in atomic context.
> Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> This is found by a static
After checking all possible call chains to kzalloc here,
my tool finds that this kzalloc is never called in atomic context.
Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
