On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
@@ -153,12 +252,11 @@ static int fpsimd_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block
*self,
{
switch (cmd) {
case CPU_PM_ENTER:
- if (current-mm)
+ if (current-mm
On 6 May 2014 18:08, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
@@ -153,12 +252,11 @@ static int fpsimd_cpu_pm_notifier(struct
notifier_block *self,
{
switch (cmd) {
case CPU_PM_ENTER:
- if
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:25:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:08, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
@@ -153,12 +252,11 @@ static int fpsimd_cpu_pm_notifier(struct
notifier_block *self,
{
If a task gets scheduled out and back in again and nothing has touched
its FPSIMD state in the mean time, there is really no reason to reload
it from memory. Similarly, repeated calls to kernel_neon_begin() and
kernel_neon_end() will preserve and restore the FPSIMD state every time.
This patch
