Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I thought after reading the code too. BTW, 2.6 does not
initialize the pointers either.
This has been changed in the cryptodev-2.6 tree:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:00:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.18-rc4-mm1:
...
git-cryptodev.patch
git trees
...
This patch fixes the following compile error:
-- snip --
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `cbc_aes_decrypt':
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:49:08PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:04:03AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:23:46AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
The attached patch actually defines ecb_encrypt_iv() and
ecb_decrypt_iv() functions that perform
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:13:46PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:49:08PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
Can we maybe define working but IV-ignoring functions for ECB (like I
did), but use memory-clearing nocrypt*() for CFB and CTR (as long as
these are not supported)?
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:49:08PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
Can we maybe define working but IV-ignoring functions for ECB (like I
did), but use memory-clearing nocrypt*() for CFB and CTR (as long as
these are not supported)? Of course, all of these will return -ENOSYS.
In cryptodev-2.6,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:09:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
BTW: The Kconfig+Makefile parts for padlock-sha seem to be missing.
Thanks Adrian.
--- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/drivers/crypto/Kconfig.old 2006-08-20
17:28:46.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/drivers/crypto/Kconfig
