On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:50:50PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
There is a generic multi-buffer infrastructure portion that manages
pulling and queuing jobs on the crypto workqueue, and it is separated out
in patch 1 of the patchset.
There's one very weird multi-line comment in that patch.
The
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:50:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So you already have an idle notifier (which is x86 only, we should fix
that I suppose), and you then double check there really isn't anything
else running.
Note that we've already done a large part of the expense of going idle
by
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:45:25PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
3.0.101-default3.753363 usecs/loop -- avg 3.770737 530.4 KHz 1.000
3.14.10-default4.145348 usecs/loop -- avg 4.139987 483.1 KHz.910
1.000
3.15.4-default 4.355594 usecs/loop -- avg 4.351961
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 21:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 16:53 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:45:25PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
3.0.101-default3.753363
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Tim Chen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 14:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:50:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So you already have an idle notifier (which is x86 only, we should fix
that I
