On 18 July 2017 at 10:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 July 2017 at 10:49, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:43:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Implement a NEON fallback for systems that do support NEON but have
>>> no support for the optional 64x64->128 polynomial multiplica
On 18 July 2017 at 10:49, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:43:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Implement a NEON fallback for systems that do support NEON but have
>> no support for the optional 64x64->128 polynomial multiplication
>> instruction that is part of the ARMv8 Crypto E
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:43:19AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Implement a NEON fallback for systems that do support NEON but have
> no support for the optional 64x64->128 polynomial multiplication
> instruction that is part of the ARMv8 Crypto Extensions. It is based
> on the paper "Fast Softwa
Implement a NEON fallback for systems that do support NEON but have
no support for the optional 64x64->128 polynomial multiplication
instruction that is part of the ARMv8 Crypto Extensions. It is based
on the paper "Fast Software Polynomial Multiplication on ARM Processors
Using the NEON Engine" by