On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:31:24PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> Apologies if this wasn't clear, but there are some cross dependencies
> with the arm64 tree, which receives non-trivial modifications in
> patches 10 and 11, which are subsequently depended upon by patches 12
> - 23.
>
> Without
On 16 March 2018 at 23:57, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 03:21:45PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> As reported by Sebastian, the way the arm64 NEON crypto code currently
>> keeps kernel mode NEON enabled across calls into skcipher_walk_xxx() is
>>
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 03:21:45PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> As reported by Sebastian, the way the arm64 NEON crypto code currently
> keeps kernel mode NEON enabled across calls into skcipher_walk_xxx() is
> causing problems with RT builds, given that the skcipher walk API may
> allocate and
On 11 March 2018 at 05:16, Vakul Garg wrote:
> Hi
>
> How does this patchset affect the throughput performance of crypto?
> Is it expected to increase?
>
This is about latency not throughput. The throughput may decrease
slightly (<1%), but spikes in scheduling latency due to
Hi
How does this patchset affect the throughput performance of crypto?
Is it expected to increase?
Regards
Vakul
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-crypto-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-crypto-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018