On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:28:37PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I think this is a better approach than the one I proposed before. This time,
I have only added a single function specifically for use by aeads:
blkcipher_aead_walk_virt_block()
which takes an additional aead param which is
On 4 March 2014 15:46, Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:28:37PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I think this is a better approach than the one I proposed before. This time,
I have only added a single function specifically for use by aeads:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:51:11PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Is there anything else required before you can take these patches?
Note that the first one should go through the arm64 tree, and may need
further review on the arm list as well, but for the first two, it is
completely up to you.
On 4 March 2014 15:53, Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:51:11PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Is there anything else required before you can take these patches?
Note that the first one should go through the arm64 tree, and may need
further review on the
