Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:46 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > […] > If we're talking about the same asciidoctor (http://asciidoctor.org/) > it's written in ruby but you can apparently run it in JVM using > JRuby. Calling it Java-based is misleading. Indeed, I was somewhat imprecise. Thanks to the work

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

David Howells wrote: > James Johnston wrote: > > > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is > > supplied on > > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is > > +supplied > > You're definitely

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 10:39 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/07/2016 11:12 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: On 03/07/2016 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: Also, what am I missing? Tying these tags to the physical page seems like a poor design to me. This seems really awkward to use. Yeah, can you describe the

Re: [PATCH v8 0/10] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:50:23PM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > Hi Wim, > > > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > > Hi Guenter, > > > > > > > The watchdog infrastructure is currently purely passive, meaning > > > > it only passes

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 12:16 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:24:54 -0700 Tags can be cleared by user by setting tag to 0. Tags are automatically cleared by the hardware when the mapping for a virtual address is removed from TSB (which is why

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/08/2016 07:58 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:41:39 -0700 Shared data may not always be backed by a file. My understanding is one of the use cases is for in-memory databases. This shared space could also be used to hand off

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 01:38 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:33:56 -0700 On 03/07/2016 12:16 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:24:54 -0700 Tags can be cleared by user by setting tag

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 11:46 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 03/07/2016 12:22 PM, David Miller wrote: >> Khalid, maybe you should share notes with the folks working on x86 >> protection keys. > > Good idea. Sparc ADI feature is indeed similar to x86 protection keys > sounds like. There are definitely some

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 12:16 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:24:54 -0700 Tags can be cleared by user by setting tag to 0. Tags are automatically cleared by the hardware when the mapping for a virtual address is removed from TSB (which is why

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 01:58 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:41:39 -0700 Shared data may not always be backed by a file. My understanding is one of the use cases is for in-memory databases. This shared space could also be used to hand off

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:58 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Khalid Aziz > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:41:39 -0700 > >> Shared data may not always be backed by a file. My understanding is >> one of the use cases is for in-memory databases. This shared

[PATCHv2 11/11] ARM: dts: Add Altera Arria10 L2 Cache EDAC devicetree entry

From: Thor Thayer Add the device tree entries needed to support the Altera L2 cache EDAC on the Arria10 chip. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer --- v2 Match register value (l2-ecc@ffd06010) --- arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi |

[PATCHv2 09/11] EDAC, altera: Addition of Arria10 L2 Cache ECC

From: Thor Thayer Addition of the Arria10 L2 Cache ECC handling. Addition of private data structure for Arria10 L2 cache ECC and the initialization function for it. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer --- v2: Split large patch into smaller

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 11:49 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: No, it changes the tag associated with the virtual address for the caller. Physical page backing this virtual address is unaffected. Tag checking is done for virtual

[PATCHv2 04/11] EDAC, altera: Add register offset for ECC Error Inject

From: Thor Thayer In preparation for the Arria10 peripheral ECCs, a register offset from the ECC base was added to the private data structure to index to the error injection register. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer --- v2: Split large

[PATCHv2 0/11] Series adding Altera Arria10 L2 Cache EDAC

This version splits the larger patch in V1 into smaller, patches. [PATCHv2 01/11] EDAC: Altera L2 Kconfig change from select to [PATCHv2 02/11] EDAC, altera: Move Device structs and defines to [PATCHv2 03/11] EDAC, altera: Add register offset for ECC Enable [PATCHv2 04/11] EDAC, altera: Add

[PATCHv2 01/11] EDAC: Altera L2 Kconfig change from select to depends upon.

From: Thor Thayer Force L2 cache dependency instead of forcing selection of L2 cache. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer --- v2 No change --- drivers/edac/Kconfig |5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:53:23 -0800 > x86 has an upcoming feature called protection keys. A page of virtual > memory has a protection key, which is a number from 0 through 16. The > master copy is in the PTE, i.e. page table entry, which is a >

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:49:57 -0800 > What data structure or structures changes when this stxa instruction happens? An internal table, maintained by the CPU and/or hypervisor, and if in physical addresses then in a region which is only accessible by

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:24:54 -0700 > Tags can be cleared by user by setting tag to 0. Tags are > automatically cleared by the hardware when the mapping for a virtual > address is removed from TSB (which is why swappable pages are a > problem), so

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: Dave Hansen Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:35:57 -0800 > On 03/02/2016 12:39 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote: >> +long enable_sparc_adi(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len) >> +{ >> +unsigned long end, pagemask; >> +int error; >> +struct vm_area_struct *vma, *vma2; >>

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > On 03/07/2016 11:12 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: >> >> On 03/07/2016 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> Also, what am I missing? Tying these tags to the physical page seems >>> like a poor design to me. This seems

Re: [PATCH v8 0/10] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure

Hi Guenter, > Hi Wim, > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > Hi Guenter, > > > > > The watchdog infrastructure is currently purely passive, meaning > > > it only passes information from user space to drivers and vice versa. > > > > [ ... ] > > > > Patches 1

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 11:09 AM, Rob Gardner wrote: On 03/07/2016 10:04 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/07/2016 09:56 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700 PR_GET_SPARC_ADICAPS Put this into a new ELF auxiliary vector entry via

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 11:08 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/07/2016 09:56 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700 PR_GET_SPARC_ADICAPS Put this into a new

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 10:04 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/07/2016 09:56 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700 PR_GET_SPARC_ADICAPS Put this into a new ELF auxiliary vector entry via ARCH_DLINFO. So now all that's left is supposedly

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 03/07/2016 08:06 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: >> Top 4-bits of sparc64 virtual address are used for version tag only when >> a process has its PSTATE.mcde bit set and it is accessing a memory >> region that has ADI

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 09:45 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700 I can remove CONFIG_SPARC_ADI. It does mean this code will be built into 32-bit kernels as well but it will be inactive code. The code should be built only into

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 08:06 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > Top 4-bits of sparc64 virtual address are used for version tag only when > a process has its PSTATE.mcde bit set and it is accessing a memory > region that has ADI enabled on it (TTE.mcd set) and a version tag was > set on the virtual address being

Re: [PATCH v8 0/10] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure

Hi Wim, On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > The watchdog infrastructure is currently purely passive, meaning > > it only passes information from user space to drivers and vice versa. > > [ ... ] > > Patches 1 till 7 of this series has been

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/02/2016 12:39 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > +long enable_sparc_adi(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len) > +{ > + unsigned long end, pagemask; > + int error; > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, *vma2; > + struct mm_struct *mm; > + > + if (!ADI_CAPABLE()) > + return

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/02/2016 12:39 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h > @@ -206,7 +206,10 @@ typedef struct siginfo { > #define SEGV_MAPERR (__SI_FAULT|1) /* address not mapped to object */ > #define SEGV_ACCERR (__SI_FAULT|2) /*

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: Khalid Aziz Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700 > I can remove CONFIG_SPARC_ADI. It does mean this code will be built > into 32-bit kernels as well but it will be inactive code. The code should be built only into obj-$(CONFIG_SPARC64) just like the rest of the

Re: [PATCH v17 2/6] ARM: socfpga: add bindings document for fpga bridge drivers

On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:25:07PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > > Add bindings documentation for Altera SOCFPGA bridges: > > * fpga2sdram > > * fpga2hps > > * hps2fpga > > * lwhps2fpga > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Tull > >

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 08:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Rob Gardner wrote: On 03/07/2016 07:07 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/05/2016 09:07 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:39:37 -0700

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

On 03/07/2016 08:30 AM, Rob Gardner wrote: On 03/07/2016 07:07 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote: On 03/05/2016 09:07 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Khalid Aziz Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:39:37 -0700 In this first implementation I am enabling ADI for hugepages only

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

James Johnston wrote: > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is supplied on > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is supplied You're definitely right about the change from enforcemodulesig to sig_enforce, but how

[PATCH v5 09/11] tpm: Initialize TPM and get durations and timeouts

Add the retrieval of TPM 1.2 durations and timeouts. Since this requires the startup of the TPM, do this for TPM 1.2 and TPM 2. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org ---

[PATCH v5 10/11] tpm: Add documentation for the tpm_vtpm device driver

Add documentation for the tpm_vtpm device driver that implements support for providing TPM functionality to Linux containers. Parts of this documentation were recycled from the Xen vTPM device driver documentation. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger CC:

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Em Mon, 7 Mar 2016 00:29:08 +0100 Johannes Stezenbach escreveu: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:29:37PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > I converted one of the big tables to CSV. At least now it recognized > > it as a table. Yet, the table was very badly formated: > >

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Em Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:48:26 +0100 Johannes Stezenbach escreveu: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:29:08AM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:29:37PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > > > I converted one of the big tables to CSV. At least

RE: [PATCH v2] can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD driver

Hi Rob, Thanks for the review comments. > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:38:35PM +, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > > This patch adds support for the CAN FD controller found in Renesas > > R-Car SoCs. The controller operates in CAN FD mode by default. > > > > CAN FD mode supports both Classical

Re: [PATCH 2/2] isdn: i4l: move active-isdn drivers to staging

On za, 2016-03-05 at 14:08 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > As a consequence, owners of HiSAX type adapters are in fact stuck with > the old hisax driver if they want to continue using i4l userspace > tools. Do you know whether or not mISDN tools offer functionality comparable to i4l tools? Paul

Re: [PATCH 2/2] isdn: i4l: move active-isdn drivers to staging

On vr, 2016-03-04 at 17:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > A third patch moves the capidrv source from drivers/isdn/capi/ > into the i4l directory. I see. Why exactly? Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to

RE: [PATCH v2] can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD driver

Hi Marc, > On 03/07/2016 09:02 AM, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > > Hi Oliver, > > > > Thanks for the review comments. > > > >> On 03/03/2016 04:38 PM, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > >> > >>> Changes since v1: > >>> * Removed testmodes & debugfs code (suggested by Oliver H) > >>> * Fixed

[PATCH] documentation: Make sample code and documentation consistent

In the chapter 'analogy with reader-writer locking', the sample code uses spinlock_t in reader-writer case. Just correct it so that we can read the document easily. Signed-off-by: Yao Dongdong --- Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 22 +++--- 1 file

RE: [PATCH v2] can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD driver

Hi Oliver, Thanks for the review comments. > On 03/03/2016 04:38 PM, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > > > Changes since v1: > > * Removed testmodes & debugfs code (suggested by Oliver H) > > * Fixed tx path race issue by introducing lock (suggested by Marc K) > > * Removed