Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] rpmsg: add THIS_MODULE to rpmsg_driver in rpmsg core

On Wed 04 May 15:01 PDT 2016, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > Add register_rpmsg_driver helper macro that adds THIS_MODULE to > rpmsg_driver for the registering driver. We rename and modify > the existing register_rpmsg_driver to enable this. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis > Acked-by:

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Em Fri, 6 May 2016 18:26:10 +0200 Markus Heiser escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > Am 06.05.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab > : > > Yeah, it looks better, however table truncation seem to be > > happening also on other parts, like the

Re: [PATCH 5/6] intel_sgx: driver documentation

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:52:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:01:06PM -0700,

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> > > What new syscalls would be needed for ssh to get all this support? >> > >> > This

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

On Fri, 06 May 2016, Markus Heiser wrote: > Am 06.05.2016 um 17:06 schrieb Jani Nikula : > >> On Fri, 06 May 2016, Markus Heiser wrote: >>> @Jonathan: what do you think? Should I prepare a patch >>> with a basic reST

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Em Fri, 6 May 2016 18:06:49 +0300 Jani Nikula escreveu: > On Fri, 06 May 2016, Markus Heiser wrote: > > @Jonathan: what do you think? Should I prepare a patch > > with a basic reST (sphinx) build infrastructure, including > > > > * a folder for

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Em Fri, 6 May 2016 16:27:21 +0200 Markus Heiser escreveu: > Hi all, hi Jonathan, > > Am 06.05.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab > : > > > Em Fri, 6 May 2016 15:32:35 +0200 > > Markus Heiser escreveu: > >

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Hi all, hi Jonathan, Am 06.05.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab : > Em Fri, 6 May 2016 15:32:35 +0200 > Markus Heiser escreveu: > >> Hi Mauro, >> >> Am 06.05.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>

Re: [PATCH 24/25] arm64:ilp32: add vdso-ilp32 and use for signal return

Hello colleagues, After all comments, VDSO fix looks like this for me. Note I renamed Andrew's ZERO macro to DELOUSE, as there already is __SC_DELOUSE which does the same, but in C, not asm. Like Bamvor, I'm not sure how we'd apply this patch - standalone or meld to VDSO. I think, VDSO patch

Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

Hi, On 2016/4/6 6:08, Yury Norov wrote: From: Andrew Pinski Add a separate syscall-table for ILP32, which dispatches either to native LP64 system call implementation or to compat-syscalls, as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski

Re: [PATCH 15/25] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

Hi, On 2016/4/6 6:08, Yury Norov wrote: Based on patch of Andrew Pinski. This patch introduces is_a32_compat_task and is_a32_thread so it is easier to say this is a a32 specific thread or a generic compat thread/task. Corresponding functions are located in to avoid mess in headers. Some

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Hi Jani, I forget to mentioning, with a local copy of my kernel-doc script: https://github.com/return42/sphkerneldoc/blob/master/scripts/kernel-doc You could do reST markup in the source code comments and extract them. This might be a interim workaround which helps you not to edit source code

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > What new syscalls would be needed for ssh to get all this support? > > > > This patchset or similar, plus some user code and an enclave to use. > > > > Sadly, on current

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Hy Jani, Am 04.05.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Jani Nikula : >> Am 04.05.2016 um 17:09 schrieb Jonathan Corbet : >> >>> I think all of this makes sense. It would be really nice to have the >>> directives in the native sphinx language like that. I *don't* think

Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

Hi Mauro, Am 04.05.2016 um 18:15 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab : > Em Wed, 4 May 2016 11:34:08 +0200 > Markus Heiser escreveu: > >> Hi all, (hi Jonathan, please take note of my offer below) >> >> Am 03.05.2016 um 16:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

On Fri 2016-05-06 01:52:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:37:52AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > > On 2016-04-29 16:17, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:00:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >>On Mon 2016-04-25 20:34:07, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >