Re: [PATCH 04/12] PM / core: Add SMART_SUSPEND driver flag

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Define and document a SMART_SUSPEND flag to instruct bus types and PM > domains that the system suspend callbacks provided by the driver can > cope with

Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Allow specifying some base host CFLAGS

2017-10-23 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Douglous 2017-10-20 14:06 GMT+09:00 Doug Anderson : > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> 2017-10-14 3:02 GMT+09:00 Douglas Anderson : >>> Right now there is a way to add some CFLAGS

[PATCH 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when PV_DEDICATED is set

2017-10-23 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Currently, the existing qspinlock implementation will fallback to test-and-set if the hypervisor has not set the PV_UNHALT flag. This patch gives the opportunity to guest kernels to select between test-and-set and the regular queueu fair lock implementation based on the PV_DEDICATED KVM feature

Re: [Update][PATCH v2 01/12] PM / core: Add NEVER_SKIP and SMART_PREPARE driver flags

2017-10-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 23, 2017 6:37:41 PM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 19 October 2017 at 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The motivation for this change is to provide a way to work around > > a problem with the

Re: [PATCH 10/12] PM / core: Add LEAVE_SUSPENDED driver flag

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Define and document a new driver flag, DPM_FLAG_LEAVE_SUSPENDED, to > instruct the PM core that it is desirable to leave the device in > runtime suspend after

Re: [PATCH 07/12] ACPI / LPSS: Consolidate runtime PM and system sleep handling

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Move the LPSS-specific code from acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend() > and acpi_lpss_runtime_resume() into separate functions, > acpi_lpss_suspend() and acpi_lpss_resume(),

Re: [PATCH 05/12] PCI / PM: Drop unnecessary invocations of pcibios_pm_ops callbacks

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The only user of non-empty pcibios_pm_ops is s390 and it only uses > "noirq" callbacks, so drop the invocations of the other pcibios_pm_ops > callbacks from the PCI

Re: [PATCH 04/12] PM / core: Add SMART_SUSPEND driver flag

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Define and document a SMART_SUSPEND flag to instruct bus types and PM > domains that the system suspend callbacks provided by the driver can > cope with

RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] thunderbolt: Additional step for built-in module to power on

2017-10-23 Thread Mario.Limonciello
> -Original Message- > From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:00 PM > To: Limonciello, Mario > Cc: andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; cor...@lwn.net; linux- > d...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] thunderbolt: Additional step for built-in module to power on

2017-10-23 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:46:18PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > Mika, > > I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won't come > in threaded right), but I > was curious and reviewed it from the web: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg50034.html >

RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] thunderbolt: Additional step for built-in module to power on

2017-10-23 Thread Mario.Limonciello
Mika, I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won't come in threaded right), but I was curious and reviewed it from the web: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg50034.html Are you sure this is true? When I saw this I tried it myself and didn't find the need

Re: [PATCH 03/12] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Modify i2c-designware-platdrv to set DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE for its > devices and return 0 from the system suspend ->prepare callback > if the device has an ACPI

Re: [PATCH 02/12] PCI / PM: Use the NEVER_SKIP driver flag

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 October 2017 at 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Replace the PCI-specific flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NEEDS_RESUME with the > PM core's DPM_FLAG_NEVER_SKIP one everywhere and drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [Update][PATCH v2 01/12] PM / core: Add NEVER_SKIP and SMART_PREPARE driver flags

2017-10-23 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 19 October 2017 at 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The motivation for this change is to provide a way to work around > a problem with the direct-complete mechanism used for avoiding > system suspend/resume handling

RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] thunderbolt: Make pathname to force_power shorter

2017-10-23 Thread Mario.Limonciello
Acked-by: Mario Limonciello > -Original Message- > From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 4:52 AM > To: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: Jonathan Corbet ;

Re: [RESEND v12 0/6] cgroup-aware OOM killer

2017-10-23 Thread Michal Hocko
On Sun 22-10-17 17:24:51, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > David would have really liked for this patchset to include knobs to > > influence how the algorithm picks cgroup victims. The rest of us > > agreed that this is beyond the scope of these patches,

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] thunderbolt: Make pathname to force_power shorter

2017-10-23 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:49:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > WMI is the bus inside kernel, so, we may access the GUID via > /sys/bus/wmi instead of doing this through /sys/devices path. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Looks reasonable. Adding Mario

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] thunderbolt: Additional step for built-in module to power on

2017-10-23 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:49:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The device will not appear until we rescan the bus. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko No, we definitely will not want to do anything like this. The controller should appear without any action

Concerning family

2017-10-23 Thread Mr Andrew Hai
Did you receive my previous email regarding your family inheritance ? Andrew. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: ReST questions

2017-10-23 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Randy Dunlap wrote: > (2) It wants to preface each "function" in the "art" with ":c:func:" and put > back-quote marks around each function name, like `finish()`. That makes the > ASCII art > unreadable. > > I have tried :: by itself and ..