On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> The thing is that the hierarchical approach (as in v8), which are you pushing,
> has it's own limitations, which we've discussed in details earlier. There are
> reasons why v12 is different, and we can't really simple go back. I mean if
> there are
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:19:18PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Related, there was also a script to do reStructuredText lint style
> checks in addition to the kernel-doc checks using make CHECK and
> C=1. See http://mid.mail-archive.com/87h98quc1w.fsf@intel.com
I don't really care which patch goes
On 30.10.2017 15:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
>> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
>> cgroup - effectively form an
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:40:20PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-10-28 4:41 GMT+09:00 Matthew Wilcox :
>> > Implement a '-none' output mode for kernel-doc which will only output
>> > warning messages,
Hi Matthew,
2017-10-30 22:40 GMT+09:00 Matthew Wilcox :
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:40:20PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-10-28 4:41 GMT+09:00 Matthew Wilcox :
>> > Implement a '-none' output mode for kernel-doc which will only output
>> >
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:40:20PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-10-28 4:41 GMT+09:00 Matthew Wilcox :
> > Implement a '-none' output mode for kernel-doc which will only output
> > warning messages, and suppresses the warning message about there being
> > no kernel-doc