Re: [PATCH 01/19] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants

On Monday, August 15, 2016 5:30:28 PM CEST Yury Norov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Yury Norov writes: > > > > > The only difference is that non-compat version forces O_LARGEFILE, > > > and it should be the default

Re: [PATCH 01/19] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Yury Norov writes: > > > The only difference is that non-compat version forces O_LARGEFILE, > > and it should be the default behaviour for all architectures, as > > we don't support 32-bit off_t. The

Re: [PATCH 01/19] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants

Yury Norov writes: > The only difference is that non-compat version forces O_LARGEFILE, > and it should be the default behaviour for all architectures, as > we don't support 32-bit off_t. The only exception is tile32, that > continues with compat version of syscalls. >

[PATCH 01/19] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants

The only difference is that non-compat version forces O_LARGEFILE, and it should be the default behaviour for all architectures, as we don't support 32-bit off_t. The only exception is tile32, that continues with compat version of syscalls. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov