On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:41:44AM -0600, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 09:15 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Instead of the "online" attribute, what do you think about using the
> > > "bind"/"unbind" API to probe the device from user space once the system
> > > is powered
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 10:22 +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Alternatively, in the style of your first para, we could push the
> host
> CPU state management into the kernel and expose a boot/reboot/power-
> off
> API to userspace. That would give us a place to hook calls for
> configuring and cleani
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 09:15 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Instead of the "online" attribute, what do you think about using the
> > "bind"/"unbind" API to probe the device from user space once the system
> > is powered on? All the hwmon registration would take place in the probe
> > function, it w
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 09:15 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 02:17 PM, Edward James wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(online, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_occ_online,
> > > > + store_occ_online);
> > > > +
> > > > +struct occ_sysfs *occ_sysfs_star
On 01/06/2017 02:17 PM, Edward James wrote:
[ ... ]
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(online, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_occ_online,
> + store_occ_online);
> +
> +struct occ_sysfs *occ_sysfs_start(struct device *dev, struct occ *occ,
> + struct occ_sysfs_config *config)
> +{
> +
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:56:04AM -0600, eajames@gmail.com wrote:
> From: "Edward A. James"
>
> Add a generic mechanism to expose the sensors provided by the OCC in
> sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward A. James
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery
> ---
> Document
From: "Edward A. James"
Add a generic mechanism to expose the sensors provided by the OCC in
sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Edward A. James
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery
---
Documentation/hwmon/occ | 48 +
drivers/hwmon/occ/Makefile| 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/oc
