On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:37:48PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:03:39AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > I have a branch based on Jarkko's patches (I believe it's up-to-date with
> > v5)
> > that implements what I described. I'd be happy to send RFC patches if
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:03:39AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I have a branch based on Jarkko's patches (I believe it's up-to-date with v5)
> that implements what I described. I'd be happy to send RFC patches if that
> would help.
That would only slow things down. The code is easy to
+ Cc: KVM, Paolo and Radim
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 09:03 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 01:08 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This is architecural. From the cursory read of that
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 01:08 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > This is architecural. From the cursory read of that series it seems there
> > are two parts to it:
> >
> > 1) The actual core handling, which should be in
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:46:45PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> > @intel: I removed intel-sgx-kernel-...@lists.01.org from CC because I can
> > do without the silly moderation spam of
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is architecural. From the cursory read of that series it seems there
> are two parts to it:
>
> 1) The actual core handling, which should be in arch/x86 because that
> hardly qualifies as a 'platform' device driver.
>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> @intel: I removed intel-sgx-kernel-...@lists.01.org from CC because I can
> do without the silly moderation spam of that list. Please disable that
> nonsense.
>
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Darren Hart wrote:
@intel: I removed intel-sgx-kernel-...@lists.01.org from CC because I can
do without the silly moderation spam of that list. Please disable that
nonsense.
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:45:28PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Is SGX considered architectural
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:45:28PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Please do not submit patches to LKML without a commit message. There is
*always* something you can provide to give the review additional context
to aid in their review of your code.
As Thomas has noted, the various maintainers have
