On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:54:54PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:38:58 -0700
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:55PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Prefix those function as deprecated to encourage all exist
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:38:58 -0700
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:55PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Prefix those function as deprecated to encourage all existing users to
> > switch to pwm_apply_state().
>
> Why not keep at least some of th
Hi Boris,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:55PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Prefix those function as deprecated to encourage all existing users to
> switch to pwm_apply_state().
Why not keep at least some of them as wrappers where we do not need to
chnage several parameters at once? It is much e
Prefix those function as deprecated to encourage all existing users to
switch to pwm_apply_state().
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
---
include/linux/pwm.h | 24
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
inde
