On 6/15/2017 4:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:49:02PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I guess I don't need the sme_active() check since the second part of the
if statement can only ever be true if SME is active (since mask is
unsigned).
... and you can define sme_me_mask
On 6/14/2017 11:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:17:32PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Add warnings to let the user know when bounce buffers are being used for
DMA when SME is active. Since the bounce buffers are not in encrypted
memory, these notifications are to allow
On 6/8/2017 2:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:17:32PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Add warnings to let the user know when bounce buffers are being used for
DMA when SME is active. Since the bounce buffers are not in encrypted
memory, these notifications are to allow
On 6/8/2017 12:53 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Tom,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:17:32PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Add warnings to let the user know when bounce buffers are being used for
> DMA when SME is active. Since the bounce buffers are not in encrypted
> memory, these notifications are to allow the user to determine some
> appropriate
Hi Tom,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
