On Tue 17-10-17 14:22:14, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:22:03PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 16-10-17 17:19:17, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Changbin Du
> > >
> > > The current name free_{huge,transhuge}_page are paired with
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:22:03PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 16-10-17 17:19:17, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > The current name free_{huge,transhuge}_page are paired with
> > alloc_{huge,transhuge}_page functions, but the actual page
On Mon 16-10-17 17:19:17, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du
>
> The current name free_{huge,transhuge}_page are paired with
> alloc_{huge,transhuge}_page functions, but the actual page free
> function is still free_page() which will indirectly call
>
On 10/16/2017 02:49 PM, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du
>
> The current name free_{huge,transhuge}_page are paired with
> alloc_{huge,transhuge}_page functions, but the actual page free
> function is still free_page() which will indirectly call
>