On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:40:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >> Thomas,
> >>
> >> Sorry for wandering off the topic of your series.
Hi Kees,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Sorry for wandering off the topic of your series. The big take away for
> > me is that you and Kees are concerned about x86
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Sorry for wandering off the topic of your series. The big take away for
>> me is that you and Kees are concerned about x86
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Sorry for wandering off the topic of your series. The big take away for
> me is that you and Kees are concerned about x86 systems pre-RDRAND.
> Just as I'm concerned about deployed embedded systems without
Thomas,
Sorry for wandering off the topic of your series. The big take away for
me is that you and Kees are concerned about x86 systems pre-RDRAND.
Just as I'm concerned about deployed embedded systems without bootloader
support for hw-rngs and so forth.
Whatever final form the approach takes