> "Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists."
>
> I prefer the "why" over the "what".
Does your opinion indicate also that you would appreciate another adjustment
around the quoted sentence from "Chapter 7: Centralized exiting of functions"
of the document
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:08:04PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The problem is that this physical address does not contain the
> encryption bit, and even if it did, it wouldn't matter. The __va()
> define creates a virtual address that will be mapped as encrypted given
> the current approach
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:57:41AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> If I do that, then I could put an #ifdef in the header to include the
> asm/mem_encrypt.h if the memory encryption is configured, else set the
> value to zero.
Yeah, something along those lines...
> I'll look into this. One
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:05:52 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Add it to the development-process book, by renaming it to
> SubmitChecklist.rst and move it to the development-process
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> ---
> .../{SubmitChecklist
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:21:17 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:46 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > If you do not have a repository with the current kernel source handy, use
> > git to obtain one. You'll want to
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:55:02 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:52:53 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > Based on the few comments it got on LKML, it seems people are accepting
> > such renames.
>
> I suspect it just
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:20:37 -0700
Joe Perches escreveu:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 11:10 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:34 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > wrote:
> > - use the correct markup to identify each section;
> > -
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:13:14 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:36 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > - Fix all chapter identation;
> > - add c blocks where needed;
>
> Here is where I think we need a bit of a
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:15:31 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:40 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > This one required lots of manual work, for it to be properly
> > displayed.
>
> And, honestly, I wonder if it was
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:17:33 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:42 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > Add a name for the document and convert the sections to
> > ReST markups.
>
> No objection to the changes (modulo
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:49:53 +0200
Laurent Navet wrote:
> No need to be be, just be should be sufficient.
To be be, or not to be be? :)
Applied to the docs tree, thanks.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:12:55 +0200
Markus Heiser wrote:
> according to your remarks I fixed the first and second patch. The third patch
> is
> resend unchanged;
OK, I've applied the first two, finally.
> > Am 06.09.2016 um 14:28 schrieb Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 15:58:53 +0200
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So don't mention it.
Applied to the docs tree, thanks.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:52:53 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Based on the few comments it got on LKML, it seems people are accepting
> such renames.
I suspect it just hasn't come to the attention of enough people yet.
A quick grep through linux-kernel traffic
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:10:26 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:34 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > - use the correct markup to identify each section;
> >
> > - Add some blank lines for Sphinx to properly interpret
>
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:36 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> - Fix all chapter identation;
> - add c blocks where needed;
Here is where I think we need a bit of a philosophical discussion...
> - Chapter 1: Indentation
> +Indentation
> +---
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:40 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> This one required lots of manual work, for it to be properly
> displayed.
And, honestly, I wonder if it was worth it. This document contains no
entries for any recent documents, many of the links in it
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:34 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> - use the correct markup to identify each section;
>
> - Add some blank lines for Sphinx to properly interpret
> the markups;
>
> - Remove a blank space on some paragraphs;
>
> - Fix the verbatim and
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:46 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> If you do not have a repository with the current kernel source handy, use
> git to obtain one. You'll want to start with the mainline repository,
> which can be grabbed with:
>
> - git clone
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:48 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> In preparation to add those files to the Sphinx build logic,
> move them to development-process/ dir and rename their extension
> to RST.
And this is the crux of the matter, of course :)
I'd like to see
20 matches
Mail list logo