Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] media: add glossary.rst with a glossary of terms used at V4L2 spec

Em Wed, 11 Oct 2017 01:18:58 +0300 Sakari Ailus escreveu: > > So, if you look, for example, at the chapter 1 name: > > "common API elements" > > > > it implies that every single V4L2 device node supports what's there. > > But that's not the case, for example, for what's

Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] media: open.rst: Adjust some terms to match the glossary

Em Wed, 11 Oct 2017 01:41:00 +0300 Sakari Ailus escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:37:43AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:48:22 +0300 > > Sakari Ailus escreveu: > > > > > Hi Mauro, > > > > > > On

Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

On Tue 10-10-17 14:13:00, David Rientjes wrote: [...] > For these reasons: unfair comparison of root mem cgroup usage to bias > against that mem cgroup from oom kill in system oom conditions, the > ability of users to completely evade the oom killer by attaching all > processes to child cgroups

Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:21:47PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > We don't need a better approximation, we need a fair comparison. The > > > heuristic that this patchset is implementing is based on the usage of > > > individual mem cgroups.

Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Michal Hocko wrote: > > For these reasons: unfair comparison of root mem cgroup usage to bias > > against that mem cgroup from oom kill in system oom conditions, the > > ability of users to completely evade the oom killer by attaching all > > processes to child cgroups

Re: [PATCH 04/24] media: v4l2-mediabus: convert flags to enums and document them

On Mon 2017-10-09 07:19:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > There is a mess with media bus flags: there are two sets of > flags, one used by parallel and ITU-R BT.656 outputs, > and another one for CSI2. > > Depending on the type, the same bit has different meanings. > > @@ -86,11 +125,22 @@

[PATCH] documentation: Update ide-cd documentation to reflect CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD_IDE removal

CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD_IDE was removed in commit 80aa31cb460d ("ide: remove CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD_IDE config option (take 2)") but the ide-cd documentation was not updated and still asks users to disable it, which is misleading and involves a fruitless search. Signed-off-by: Finn Thain

Re: [PATCH 1/4] iio: adc: ina2xx: Make max expected current configurable

On 10/09/2017 03:35 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:08:42 +0200 Maciej Purski wrote: On 10/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:11:31 +0200 Maciej Purski wrote: On 10/01/2017 12:29 PM, Jonathan

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kbuild: Add a cache for generated variables

Hi, On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Douglas, > > > 2017-10-05 7:37 GMT+09:00 Douglas Anderson : >> While timing a "no-op" build of the kernel (incrementally building the >> kernel even though nothing changed) in

Re: [PATCH 1/4] iio: adc: ina2xx: Make max expected current configurable

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:42:53 +0200 Maciej Purski wrote: > On 10/09/2017 03:35 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:08:42 +0200 > > Maciej Purski wrote: > > > >> On 10/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> On Wed, 04 Oct

Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:13:00PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > This seems to unfairly bias the root mem cgroup depending on process > > > size. > > > It isn't treated fairly as a leaf mem cgroup if they are being compared > > > based on

Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] kernel-doc: add supported to document nested structs/

Em Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:19:55 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > > > I really don't want to add that much noise to the docs build; I think it > > > will defeat any hope of cleaning up the warnings we already have. I > > > wonder if we could suppress warnings about

Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > We don't need a better approximation, we need a fair comparison. The > > heuristic that this patchset is implementing is based on the usage of > > individual mem cgroups. For the root mem cgroup to be considered > > eligible, we need to

Re: [PATCH v8 01/20] crypto: change transient busy return code to -EAGAIN

On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:51:42AM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Herbert Xu > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 03:38:40PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > >> > >> diff --git a/crypto/algif_hash.c b/crypto/algif_hash.c > >> index