Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] thunderbolt: Updating the register definitions

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Amir Levy wrote: > Adding more Thunderbolt(TM) register definitions > and some helper macros. Thinking about this again I would prefer it if you would put your definitions into a separate file under icm/ (even if there is some

Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] thunderbolt: Macro rename

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Amir Levy wrote: > This first patch updates the registers file to > reflect that it isn't only for Cactus Ridge. > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Amir Levy > --- > drivers/thunderbolt/nhi_regs.h

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) networking

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:23:45PM +0300, Amir Levy wrote: >> This is version 6 of Thunderbolt(TM) driver for non-Apple hardware. >> >> Changes since v5: >> - Removed the padding of short packets in receive >> -

Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 06:14:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > OFVWG meetings have absolutely zero relevance for Linux development. Well, to be fair there are a fair number of kernel developers on that particular call.. > More "flexibility" for drivers just means giving up on designing a >

Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:51:42AM +0300, Matan Barak wrote: > All recent proposals of the new ABI schema deals with extending the > flexibility of the current schema by letting drivers define their specific > types, actions, attributes, etc. Even more than that, the dispatching > starts from

Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:25:13PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > > a) delay cgroups support until the grand rewrite is done > > b) add it now and deal with the consequences later > > > Can we do (b) now and differ adding any HW resources to cgroup until > they are clearly called out. >

Re: [PATCH 9/9] selftests: Update vDSO Makefile to work under selftests

On 9/10/2016 1:22 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: Update vDSO Makefile to work under selftests. vDSO will not be run as part of selftests suite and will not included in install targets. They can be ^ be built separately for now. Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

Re: [PATCH 7/9] selftests: Update ptp Makefile to work under selftests

Hello. On 9/10/2016 1:22 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: Update ptp Makefile to work under selftests. ptp will not be run as part of selftests suite and will not included in install targets. They can be ^ be built separately for now. Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Move runnable code (tests) from Documentation to selftests

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:22:41 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote: > Move runnable code (tests) from Documentation to selftests and update > Makefiles to work under selftests. > > Jon Corbet and I discussed this in an email thread and as per that > discussion, this patch series moves