Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: kvm: inject SError with user space specified syndrome

Hi Christoffer, thanks for the review. On 2017/7/3 16:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > Hi Dongjiu, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:46:39PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> when SError happen, kvm notifies user space to record the CPER, >> user space specifies and passes the contents of ESR_EL1 on

Re: [PULL] Docs for 4.13

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >You'll also encounter more than the usual number of conflicts, which >is saying something. Hmm. I fixed the ones that were actual data conflicts, but I think there ends up being several things that are just

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/idle: use dynamic halt poll

On 2017/7/3 18:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, Yang Zhang wrote: The background is that we(Alibaba Cloud) do get more and more complaints from our customers in both KVM and Xen compare to bare-mental.After investigations, the root cause is known to us: big cost in message passing

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design

On Thu, 25 May 2017 13:26:32 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > The rt-mutex-design documents didn't gotten meaningful update from its > first version. Even after owner's pending bit was removed in commit > 8161239a8bcc > ("rtmutex: Simplify PI algorithm and make highest prio task get

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: kvm: inject SError with user space specified syndrome

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:09 PM, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > thank you very much for your review. > > > 2017-07-03 15:50 GMT+08:00, Christoffer Dall : >> Hi Dongjiu, >> >> It seems you sent this patch twice, once on its own and then part of a

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: kvm: inject SError with user space specified syndrome

Hi Christoffer, thank you very much for your review. 2017-07-03 15:50 GMT+08:00, Christoffer Dall : > Hi Dongjiu, > > It seems you sent this patch twice, once on its own and then part of a > series? Christoffer, yes, it is. once on its own and then part of a series > > Also,

Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] crypto: change backlog return code to -EIOCBQUEUED

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:41:43PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: >> The crypto API was using the -EBUSY return value to indicate >> both a hard failure to submit a crypto operation into a >> transformation provider

[PULL] Docs for 4.13

The following changes since commit 2ea659a9ef488125eb46da6eb571de5eae5c43f6: Linux 4.12-rc1 (2017-05-13 13:19:49 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.lwn.net/linux.git tags/docs-4.13 for you to fetch changes up to 1cb566ba5634d7593b8b2a0a5c83f1c9e14b2e09:

Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: handle DECLARE_HASHTABLE

On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 12:11:03 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > That was my question as well...as Andrew would ask: what are the > > user-visible effects of this problem? > > The commit which made me write the patch is sitting in Dave Miller's > net-next tree: > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already > queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could > try to cherry-pick through stable. I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at

Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] crypto: change backlog return code to -EIOCBQUEUED

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:41:43PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > The crypto API was using the -EBUSY return value to indicate > both a hard failure to submit a crypto operation into a > transformation provider when the latter was busy and the backlog > mechanism was not enabled as well as a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs RDT theme: fix bottom margin of lists items

Hi Jon, sorry for my noise .. did you received the two patches? -- Markus -- > Am 17.06.2017 um 10:17 schrieb Markus Heiser : > > List items with two ore more blocks are not well rendered. E.g. the gap > between last block (l1-b2) of the first list item and the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/idle: use dynamic halt poll

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, Yang Zhang wrote: > The background is that we(Alibaba Cloud) do get more and more complaints from > our customers in both KVM and Xen compare to bare-mental.After investigations, > the root cause is known to us: big cost in message passing workload(David show > it in KVM forum

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/idle: use dynamic halt poll

On 2017/6/27 22:22, Radim Krčmář wrote: 2017-06-27 15:56+0200, Paolo Bonzini: On 27/06/2017 15:40, Radim Krčmář wrote: ... which is not necessarily _wrong_. It's just a different heuristic. Right, it's just harder to use than host's single_task_running() -- the VCPU calling

Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: fix wrong example command

From: Matteo Croce Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 18:21:47 +0200 > In the IPVLAN documentation there is an example command line where the > master and slave interface names are inverted. > Fix the command line and also add the optional `name' keyword to better > describe what the

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: kvm: inject SError with user space specified syndrome

Hi Dongjiu, On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:46:39PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > when SError happen, kvm notifies user space to record the CPER, > user space specifies and passes the contents of ESR_EL1 on taking > a virtual SError interrupt to KVM, KVM enables virtual system > error or asynchronous

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF > builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following > patch series. It's a combination of little mistakes and fragility in the >

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: kvm: route synchronous external abort exceptions to el2

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:15:49PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > correct the commit message: > > In the firmware-first RAS solution, OS receives an synchronous > external abort, then trapped to EL3 by SCR_EL3.EA. Firmware inspects > the HCR_EL2.TEA and chooses the target to send APEI's SEA

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: kvm: support user space to detect RAS extension feature

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:45:43PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > Handle userspace's detection for RAS extension, because sometimes > the userspace needs to know the CPU's capacity Why? Can you please provide some more rationale. > > Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng > --- >

Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc parser mishandles declarations split into lines

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:27:48PM +0200, Markus Heiser wrote: > Reported by Johannes Berg [1]. Problem here: function > process_proto_type() concatenates the striped lines of declaration > without any whitespace. A one-liner of:: > > struct something { >struct foo >bar; >

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: kvm: inject SError with user space specified syndrome

Hi Dongjiu, It seems you sent this patch twice, once on its own and then part of a series? Also, please use a cover letter when sending patch series. Thanks, -Christoffer On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:39:15PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > when SError happen, kvm notifies user space to record the